Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi

Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Ali Memariani, Shion Guha

Data is a crucial infrastructure to how artificial intelligence (AI) systems learn. However, these systems to date have been largely model-centric, putting a premium on the model at the expense of the data quality. Data quality issues beset the performance of AI systems, particularly in downstream deployments and in real-world applications. Data-centric AI (DCAI) as an emerging concept brings data, its quality and its dynamism to the forefront in considerations of AI systems through an iterative and systematic approach. As one of the first overviews, this article brings together data-centric perspectives and concepts to outline the foundations of DCAI. It specifically formulates six guiding principles for researchers and practitioners and gives direction for future advancement of DCAI.

Amir Karami, Christoph Lutz, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi et al.

Anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing area of interest, as AI systems increasingly exhibit human-like expressions, behaviors and interaction styles. This research serves as a systematic observation and categorization of anthropomorphic behaviors in AI outputs. Anthropomorphic behavior refers to the deliberate or emergent manifestation of human-like expressions or linguistic cues in system outputs, such as demonstrating empathy. Using a behaviorally driven taxonomy, our study identifies key forms of anthropomorphic behaviors in the responses of ChatGPT and examines their implications for the theory, practice and ethics of AI systems. The taxonomy enables more nuanced detection of anthropomorphism, offering value to developers and policymakers in balancing the benefits with the potential risks. This work contributes to the academic discourse by providing a foundation for future efforts to refine, expand, and automate the detection of anthropomorphic behavior across diverse AI applications.

Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, Stanley Ahalt

This article explores human-horse interactions as a metaphor for understanding and designing effective human-AI partnerships. Drawing on the long history of human collaboration with horses, we propose that AI, like horses, should complement rather than replace human capabilities. We move beyond traditional benchmarks such as the Turing test, which emphasize AI's ability to mimic human intelligence, and instead advocate for a symbiotic relationship where distinct intelligences enhance each other. We analyze key elements of human-horse relationships: trust, communication, and mutual adaptability, to highlight essential principles for human-AI collaboration. Trust is critical in both partnerships, built through predictability and shared understanding, while communication and feedback loops foster mutual adaptability. We further discuss the importance of taming and habituation in shaping these interactions, likening it to how humans train AI to perform reliably and ethically in real-world settings. The article also addresses the asymmetry of responsibility, where humans ultimately bear the greater burden of oversight and ethical judgment. Finally, we emphasize that long-term commitment and continuous learning are vital in both human-horse and human-AI relationships, as ongoing interaction refines the partnership and increases mutual adaptability. By drawing on these insights from human-horse interactions, we offer a vision for designing AI systems that are trustworthy, adaptable, and capable of fostering symbiotic human-AI partnerships.