Peter Viechnicki

Brian Yan, Qingzheng Wang, Matthew Wiesner et al.

We present CS-YODAS, a Creative Commons-licensed dataset of in-the-wild code-switched speech mined from multilingual YouTube data. Code-switching (CS), or the alternation between languages within an utterance or conversation, is common in multilingual settings but remains underrepresented in existing CS speech resources, which are typically small, domain-specific, or artificially constructed. Building on the YODAS corpus, we develop a scalable, human-in-the-loop pipeline for identifying and validating naturally occurring code-switching. The resulting dataset, which totals 313 hours and spans 7 matrix languages, provides diverse, real-world examples of spontaneous code-switched speech. We further analyze the distribution and characteristics of code-switching in the wild, examining language-pair frequencies and switching patterns, and report baseline results for spoken language identification. We hope that CS-YODAS will encourage broader and more comprehensive research on code-switched speech. Dataset link: https://huggingface.co/datasets/byan/cs-yodas.

Kaavya Chaparala, Thomas Thebaud, Jesús Villalba López et al.

There are not enough established benchmarks for the task fo speech summarization. Creating new benchmarks demands human annotation, as LLMs could embed systemic errors and bias into datasets. We test ten annotation workflows varying input modality (audio, transcript, or both) and the inclusion of editing (self or peer-editing) to investigate potential quality tradeoffs from using human annotators to summarize audio. We compare human audio-based summaries to human transcript-based summaries to track the impact of the different information modalities on summary quality. We also compare the human outputs against four LLM benchmarks (three text, one audio) to examine whether human-written summaries are less informative than highly fluent automated outputs. We find that audio-based summaries are less informative and more compressed than transcript summaries. However, iterative peer-editing with audio mitigates this difference, enabling audio-based summaries to be as informative as their transcript counterparts and LLM summaries. These findings validate iterative peer-editing among human annotators for the creation of benchmarks informed by both lexical and prosodic information. This enables crucial dataset collection even in setting where transcripts are unavailable.