Prachi Agrawal

Mengmi Zhang, Elisa Pavarino, Xiao Liu et al.

As AI becomes increasingly embedded in daily life, ascertaining whether an agent is human is critical. We systematically benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks (image captioning, word association, conversation) and three vision tasks (color estimation, object detection, attention prediction), collecting data from 636 humans and 37 AI agents. Next, we conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges. Current AIs are approaching the ability to convincingly impersonate humans and deceive human judges in both language and vision. Even simple AI judges outperformed humans in distinguishing AI from human responses. Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics, suggesting that passing as human is an important independent evaluation criterion. The large-scale Turing datasets and metrics introduced here offer valuable benchmarks for assessing human-likeness in AI and highlight the importance of rigorous, quantitative imitation tests for AI development.

Yufei Li, Zaiwei Zhang, Mingfu Liang et al.

Industrial recommendation systems serve billions of users through a multi-stage funnel -- retrieval, early-stage ranking, and re-ranking -- where the final re-ranking step disproportionately shapes user engagement and downstream performance, particularly for carousel and grid display formats. Despite growing enthusiasm for Large Language Models (LLMs) in recommendation, three gaps hinder industrial adoption: (1) most efforts target retrieval and ranking, leaving re-ranking -- the stage closest to the final user experience -- largely underexplored; (2) LLMs are typically deployed zero-shot or via supervised fine-tuning, underutilizing the reasoning capabilities unlocked by reinforcement learning (RL) on verifiable rewards; (3) deployed catalogs index billions of items with non-semantic identifiers that lie outside any base-LLM vocabulary. We present GR2 (Generative Reasoning Re-Ranker), an end-to-end framework that combines (i) mid-training on semantic IDs produced by a tokenizer with >=99% uniqueness, (ii) reasoning-trace distilled from a stronger teacher via targeted prompting and rejection sampling, and (iii) RL with verifiable rewards purpose-built for re-ranking. To make GR2 resource-viable, we further (iv) introduce a context compressor that amortizes training cost, On-Policy Distillation (OPD) as a scalable alternative to SFT -- which we find collapses at industrial scale -- and reasoning distillation for low-latency serving. GR2 delivers +18.7% R@1, +7.1% R@3, and +9.6% N@3 over legacy baselines on industrial-scale traffic. We further find that reward design is critical in re-ranking: LLMs often hack rewards by preserving the incoming order or exploiting position bias, motivating conditional verifiable rewards as essential industrial components.

Prachi Agrawal, Narinder Singh Punn, Sanjay Kumar Sonbhadra et al.

Adversarial attacks against deep learning models have gained significant attention and recent works have proposed explanations for the existence of adversarial examples and techniques to defend the models against these attacks. Attention in computer vision has been used to incorporate focused learning of important features and has led to improved accuracy. Recently, models with attention mechanisms have been proposed to enhance adversarial robustness. Following this context, this work aims at a general understanding of the impact of attention on adversarial robustness. This work presents a comparative study of adversarial robustness of non-attention and attention based image classification models trained on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Fashion MNIST datasets under the popular white box and black box attacks. The experimental results show that the robustness of attention based models may be dependent on the datasets used i.e. the number of classes involved in the classification. In contrast to the datasets with less number of classes, attention based models are observed to show better robustness towards classification.