Roy Abel

Roy Abel, Yoram Louzoun

Graph convolution networks (GCN) have emerged as the leading method to classify node classes in networks, and have reached the highest accuracy in multiple node classification tasks. In the absence of available tagged samples, active learning methods have been developed to obtain the highest accuracy using the minimal number of queries to an oracle. The current best active learning methods use the sample class uncertainty as selection criteria. However, in graph based classification, the class of each node is often related to the class of its neighbors. As such, the uncertainty in the class of a node's neighbor may be a more appropriate selection criterion. We here propose two such criteria, one extending the classical uncertainty measure, and the other extending the page-rank algorithm. We show that the latter is optimal when the fraction of tagged nodes is low, and when this fraction grows to one over the average degree, the regional uncertainty performs better than all existing methods. While we have tested this methods on graphs, such methods can be extended to any classification problem, where a distance metrics can be defined between the input samples. All the code used can be accessed at : https://github.com/louzounlab/graph-al All the datasets used can be accessed at : https://github.com/louzounlab/DataSets

Roy Abel, Idan Benami, Yoram Louzoun

In colored graphs, node classes are often associated with either their neighbors class or with information not incorporated in the graph associated with each node. We here propose that node classes are also associated with topological features of the nodes. We use this association to improve Graph machine learning in general and specifically, Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN). First, we show that even in the absence of any external information on nodes, a good accuracy can be obtained on the prediction of the node class using either topological features, or using the neighbors class as an input to a GCN. This accuracy is slightly less than the one that can be obtained using content based GCN. Secondly, we show that explicitly adding the topology as an input to the GCN does not improve the accuracy when combined with external information on nodes. However, adding an additional adjacency matrix with edges between distant nodes with similar topology to the GCN does significantly improve its accuracy, leading to results better than all state of the art methods in multiple datasets.