Dani Manjah

CV
h-index2
4papers
19citations
Novelty53%
AI Score38

4 Papers

4.3MAJun 30
Holonic Active Distillation for Scalable Multi-Agent Learning in Multi-Sensor Systems

Dani Manjah, Tim Bary, Benoît Macq et al.

The rapid expansion of sensor-based networks introduces major challenges in scalability, adaptability, and knowledge transfer, especially in open environments where new subsystems can dynamically join or leave. In this work, we propose a Holonic Active Distillation architecture within a Holonic Multi-Agent System (HMAS) to address these issues. Our approach integrates Clustered Stream-Based Active Distillation (CSBAD), a framework in which specialized student models collect local data, query pseudo-labels from teacher models, and cluster into groups of similar sensors. Results show that the holonic organization balances local specialization with global generalization, while efficiently adapting to sensor departures and re-integrations. We also analyzed trade-offs among incremental model updates, system reorganization, and scalability limits. Our findings highlight the advantages of holonic learning for multi-sensor systems while identifying key challenges related to model drift and long-term adaptation.

3.7CVApr 16, 2024Code
Camera clustering for scalable stream-based active distillation

Dani Manjah, Davide Cacciarelli, Christophe De Vleeschouwer et al.

We present a scalable framework designed to craft efficient lightweight models for video object detection utilizing self-training and knowledge distillation techniques. We scrutinize methodologies for the ideal selection of training images from video streams and the efficacy of model sharing across numerous cameras. By advocating for a camera clustering methodology, we aim to diminish the requisite number of models for training while augmenting the distillation dataset. The findings affirm that proper camera clustering notably amplifies the accuracy of distilled models, eclipsing the methodologies that employ distinct models for each camera or a universal model trained on the aggregate camera data.

3.6CVSep 24, 2025
Data-Efficient Stream-Based Active Distillation for Scalable Edge Model Deployment

Dani Manjah, Tim Bary, Benoît Gérin et al.

Edge camera-based systems are continuously expanding, facing ever-evolving environments that require regular model updates. In practice, complex teacher models are run on a central server to annotate data, which is then used to train smaller models tailored to the edge devices with limited computational power. This work explores how to select the most useful images for training to maximize model quality while keeping transmission costs low. Our work shows that, for a similar training load (i.e., iterations), a high-confidence stream-based strategy coupled with a diversity-based approach produces a high-quality model with minimal dataset queries.

3.6CVJul 10, 2025
Patient-specific vs Multi-Patient Vision Transformer for Markerless Tumor Motion Forecasting

Gauthier Rotsart de Hertaing, Dani Manjah, Benoit Macq

Background: Accurate forecasting of lung tumor motion is essential for precise dose delivery in proton therapy. While current markerless methods mostly rely on deep learning, transformer-based architectures remain unexplored in this domain, despite their proven performance in trajectory forecasting. Purpose: This work introduces a markerless forecasting approach for lung tumor motion using Vision Transformers (ViT). Two training strategies are evaluated under clinically realistic constraints: a patient-specific (PS) approach that learns individualized motion patterns, and a multi-patient (MP) model designed for generalization. The comparison explicitly accounts for the limited number of images that can be generated between planning and treatment sessions. Methods: Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) derived from planning 4DCT scans of 31 patients were used to train the MP model; a 32nd patient was held out for evaluation. PS models were trained using only the target patient's planning data. Both models used 16 DRRs per input and predicted tumor motion over a 1-second horizon. Performance was assessed using Average Displacement Error (ADE) and Final Displacement Error (FDE), on both planning (T1) and treatment (T2) data. Results: On T1 data, PS models outperformed MP models across all training set sizes, especially with larger datasets (up to 25,000 DRRs, p < 0.05). However, MP models demonstrated stronger robustness to inter-fractional anatomical variability and achieved comparable performance on T2 data without retraining. Conclusions: This is the first study to apply ViT architectures to markerless tumor motion forecasting. While PS models achieve higher precision, MP models offer robust out-of-the-box performance, well-suited for time-constrained clinical settings.