Wei Wang

LG
h-index2
3papers
19citations
Novelty48%
AI Score32

3 Papers

7.7LGOct 10, 2023
TANGO: Time-Reversal Latent GraphODE for Multi-Agent Dynamical Systems

Zijie Huang, Wanjia Zhao, Jingdong Gao et al. · stanford

Learning complex multi-agent system dynamics from data is crucial across many domains, such as in physical simulations and material modeling. Extended from purely data-driven approaches, existing physics-informed approaches such as Hamiltonian Neural Network strictly follow energy conservation law to introduce inductive bias, making their learning more sample efficiently. However, many real-world systems do not strictly conserve energy, such as spring systems with frictions. Recognizing this, we turn our attention to a broader physical principle: Time-Reversal Symmetry, which depicts that the dynamics of a system shall remain invariant when traversed back over time. It still helps to preserve energies for conservative systems and in the meanwhile, serves as a strong inductive bias for non-conservative, reversible systems. To inject such inductive bias, in this paper, we propose a simple-yet-effective self-supervised regularization term as a soft constraint that aligns the forward and backward trajectories predicted by a continuous graph neural network-based ordinary differential equation (GraphODE). It effectively imposes time-reversal symmetry to enable more accurate model predictions across a wider range of dynamical systems under classical mechanics. In addition, we further provide theoretical analysis to show that our regularization essentially minimizes higher-order Taylor expansion terms during the ODE integration steps, which enables our model to be more noise-tolerant and even applicable to irreversible systems. Experimental results on a variety of physical systems demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. Particularly, it achieves an MSE improvement of 11.5 % on a challenging chaotic triple-pendulum systems.

10.7LGNov 27, 2023Code
Learning with Complementary Labels Revisited: The Selected-Completely-at-Random Setting Is More Practical

Wei Wang, Takashi Ishida, Yu-Jie Zhang et al.

Complementary-label learning is a weakly supervised learning problem in which each training example is associated with one or multiple complementary labels indicating the classes to which it does not belong. Existing consistent approaches have relied on the uniform distribution assumption to model the generation of complementary labels, or on an ordinary-label training set to estimate the transition matrix in non-uniform cases. However, either condition may not be satisfied in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel consistent approach that does not rely on these conditions. Inspired by the positive-unlabeled (PU) learning literature, we propose an unbiased risk estimator based on the Selected-Completely-at-Random assumption for complementary-label learning. We then introduce a risk-correction approach to address overfitting problems. Furthermore, we find that complementary-label learning can be expressed as a set of negative-unlabeled binary classification problems when using the one-versus-rest strategy. Extensive experimental results on both synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets validate the superiority of our proposed approach over state-of-the-art methods.

5.9SEApr 29, 2025
CoCo-Bench: A Comprehensive Code Benchmark For Multi-task Large Language Model Evaluation

Wenjing Yin, Tianze Sun, Yijiong Yu et al.

Large language models (LLMs) play a crucial role in software engineering, excelling in tasks like code generation and maintenance. However, existing benchmarks are often narrow in scope, focusing on a specific task and lack a comprehensive evaluation framework that reflects real-world applications. To address these gaps, we introduce CoCo-Bench (Comprehensive Code Benchmark), designed to evaluate LLMs across four critical dimensions: code understanding, code generation, code modification, and code review. These dimensions capture essential developer needs, ensuring a more systematic and representative evaluation. CoCo-Bench includes multiple programming languages and varying task difficulties, with rigorous manual review to ensure data quality and accuracy. Empirical results show that CoCo-Bench aligns with existing benchmarks while uncovering significant variations in model performance, effectively highlighting strengths and weaknesses. By offering a holistic and objective evaluation, CoCo-Bench provides valuable insights to guide future research and technological advancements in code-oriented LLMs, establishing a reliable benchmark for the field.