Xia Y

Zhiwen Mo, Yu Cheng, Lei Wang et al.

Recent GPU programming frameworks such as Triton, TileLang, and CUDA Tile adopt tiles as first-class primitives, making tile-centric programming the prevailing approach for high-performance GPU kernels. Performance-analysis tooling has not followed: programmers still rely on coarse roofline bounds, opaque ML predictors, or post-hoc profilers to understand kernel execution. This gap is acute for modern AI workloads, where kernel fusion and distributed inference depend on tensor cores, CUDA cores, cache hierarchies, memory pipelines, and inter-GPU networks. We present TileSight, a tile-centric performance-modeling tool that elevates the tile from a programming primitive to an analysis primitive. Within a GPU core, TileSight models compute-memory pipeline overlap; across cores, it models the cache hierarchy; across GPUs, it models inter-node communication. All layers share the tile abstraction: the intra-tile layer expresses work as a resource vector spanning network, memory, and compute pipelines; the inter-tile layer schedules dependent and ordered actions to expose legal overlap and infers multi-level cache hit rates from tile reuse distance; and the cross-device layer maps remote tensor accesses to placements and routes them through an alpha-beta stage cost. On A100, H200, B200, and B6000, TileSight predicts single-GPU kernel latency with 12.35% pooled mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), outperforming state-of-the-art baselines and transferring better across architectures. Its L2 cache-hit-rate predictions are within roughly one percentage point of measurements on every GPU. At up to 32 GPUs, TileSight achieves 16.18% weighted MAPE (wMAPE) on fused distributed kernels and 13.52% wMAPE on end-to-end vLLM serving. In optimization, TileSight selects tile configurations competitive with strong vendor and expert baselines. TileSight will be open-sourced upon publication.

Zibin Lin, Shengli Zhang, Taotao Wang et al.

Agent Skills package reusable procedural knowledge as external artifacts for frozen language-model agents, yet existing optimizers do not jointly resolve where a failure occurs in a workflow, which mechanism caused it, and how relevant knowledge from third-party Skills should be reused locally. We introduce Workflow-Localized Mechanism Learning (WML). Its Node--Mechanism Attribution identifies the failed workflow node, implicated mechanisms, and smallest valid edit target, routing single-mechanism defects to L3 resources and relational defects across mechanisms to L2 composition protocols. A six-module Workflow-Guided Skill Optimization (WGSO) loop then selects provenance- and scope-aware third-party knowledge, applies bounded patches, evaluates candidates, and stores verified outcomes in optimizer-side memory. On SpreadsheetBench, WML reaches 90.33 +/- 1.53 and 74.67 +/- 3.51 Hard Accuracy with DeepSeek and Qwen3.6-Flash, respectively; without additional optimization, the learned Skills transfer to WikiTableQuestions with 84.00 +/- 2.00 and 83.00 +/- 2.00 Denotation Accuracy. On Compiler-Supported50, WML attains both the highest hard-PASS rate and the lowest cost per successful task; compiled execution sharply reduces tokens and calls relative to a direct SkillAgent while retaining most of its successful tasks. Code and artifacts are available at https://github.com/xiaolin9595/workflow-localized-mechanism-learning.

Songchen Xu, Ting Song, Shaohan Huang et al.

We present VibeVoice-ASR-BitNet, a compressed variant of VibeVoice-ASR optimized for real-time inference on edge CPUs. We apply heterogeneous quantization tailored to the computational characteristics of each stage: the VAE acoustic tokenizer uses full-pipeline INT8 quantization (I8_S) with kernel fusion and SIMD optimization, while the autoregressive language model adopts BitNet-style ternary weights (I2_S). To preserve accuracy under aggressive compression, we employ a progressive quantization-aware training strategy. For inference, we implement custom SIMD kernels and fused operators within the ggml framework targeting both ARM and x86 platforms, achieving real-time recognition with RTF < 1 using as few as 3 CPU threads. VibeVoice-ASR-BitNet is 1.6-2.3x faster than Whisper.cpp at comparable model sizes (~1.6 GB), with only modest accuracy degradation compared to the FP16 baseline.

Yan Xia, Dominik Batorski, Erin Wertz et al.

Web browsers now provide AI-generated news summaries for millions of users. Despite their popularity and influence, we lack a systematic understanding of how these systems transform news before people read it. Through a large-scale audit, we investigate the factual accuracy of browser-based AI summarizers and how they alter the political bias, negative affect, and journalistic writing quality of news. Drawing on 13,777 articles from 15 U.S. news outlets, we evaluate their 41,331 summaries generated by three leading AI-powered browsers: Google Chrome (Gemini), Microsoft Edge (Copilot), and Perplexity Comet. We find that browser-based AI summarizers are broadly accurate. Furthermore, they consistently transform news by attenuating ideological bias, partisan stances, negativity, anger, and fear, while increasing clarity and reducing personal tone. With some variations, these patterns hold across browsers, outlet ideologies, and topics. Our findings identify AI-powered browsers as a new class of editorial intermediaries that systematically reshape news, with implications for democratic discourse and AI governance.

Ziteng Hu, Jiachi Chen, Wenhao Lv et al.

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led practitioners to increasingly rely on them for answering questions about hardware description languages (HDLs). Because HDL is ultimately synthesized into physical hardware, an imprecise or redundant answer can propagate into timing violations or non-synthesizable logic that surface only late in the design flow, making the quality of HDL answers especially consequential. However, the quality of LLM-generated responses, particularly in comparison with answers provided by human experts, remains unclear. To investigate this question, we collect 6,246 HDL Q&A posts with accepted answers from Stack Overflow and curate them into a dataset, organized into a taxonomy of four main categories (Conceptual, Debugging, Generation, and Optimization) and ten subcategories. Using this dataset, we design a user study conducted with 19 HDL engineers with one to three years of experience. Our findings reveal a pervasive over answering tendency: LLMs supply correct content but bury it under redundant alternatives (65.7%) and verbose padding (69.1%), while nearly half of answers (49.0%) fail to fully align with expert answers yet participants still preferred LLM responses for readability (58.3%). Motivated by these findings, we propose a multi-agent framework for improving LLM-based HDL question answering. We evaluate answer quality using an LLM-as-Judge and two structural metrics: the number of core answers, which reflects redundancy since LLMs often provide multiple alternative solutions, and the length of non-core content, which reflects verbosity. Evaluated on the four mainstream LLMs, our framework increases the average core-answer quality score from 3.71 to 4.67 (+0.96) and the non-core content quality from 3.72 to 4.23 (+0.51), on a five-point scale.