Sen Chen

SD
h-index11
5papers
86citations
Novelty44%
AI Score45

5 Papers

7.8SEApr 21Code
DeepFWI: Identifying Bug-Sensitive Warnings with Multi-Modal Code-Warning Semantics

Han Liu, Jian Zhang, Cen Zhang et al.

Static analysis tools have evolved over time to assist in detecting bugs. However, the excessive false warnings can impede developers' productivity and confidence in the tools. Previous research efforts have explored learning-based approaches to identify bug warnings. Nevertheless, their coarse granularity, focusing on either long-term warnings or function-level alerts, is insensitive to individual bugs. Also, they rely on manually crafted features or solely on source code semantics, which is inadequate for effective learning. In this paper, we propose DeepFWI, a learning-based approach that identifies bug-sensitive warnings at a fine-grained granularity. Specifically, we design a novel LSTM-based model that captures multi-modal semantics of source code and warnings from automated static analysis tools (ASATs) and highlights their correlations with cross-attention. To tackle the data scarcity of training and evaluation, we collected a large-scale dataset of 280,273 warnings. We conducted extensive experiments on the dataset to evaluate DeepFWI. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, with an F1-score 67.06% for confirming true warnings in a finer-grained manner, significantly outperforming all baselines. Additionally, to validate the practicality of DeepFWI from the perspective of developers, we applied DeepFWI to four popular open-source projects. Our approach filtered out the vast majority of warnings, while still successfully surfacing 25 true bug-related warnings that were confirmed through manual analysis.

1.7SEAug 9, 2023Code
A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bugs in Open-Source Federated Learning Frameworks

Weijie Shao, Yuyang Gao, Fu Song et al.

Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning (ML) paradigm, allowing multiple clients to collaboratively train shared machine learning (ML) models without exposing clients' data privacy. It has gained substantial popularity in recent years, especially since the enforcement of data protection laws and regulations in many countries. To foster the application of FL, a variety of FL frameworks have been proposed, allowing non-experts to easily train ML models. As a result, understanding bugs in FL frameworks is critical for facilitating the development of better FL frameworks and potentially encouraging the development of bug detection, localization and repair tools. Thus, we conduct the first empirical study to comprehensively collect, taxonomize, and characterize bugs in FL frameworks. Specifically, we manually collect and classify 1,119 bugs from all the 676 closed issues and 514 merged pull requests in 17 popular and representative open-source FL frameworks on GitHub. We propose a classification of those bugs into 12 bug symptoms, 12 root causes, and 18 fix patterns. We also study their correlations and distributions on 23 functionalities. We identify nine major findings from our study, discuss their implications and future research directions based on our findings.

20.2SDJun 7, 2022
Towards Understanding and Mitigating Audio Adversarial Examples for Speaker Recognition

Guangke Chen, Zhe Zhao, Fu Song et al.

Speaker recognition systems (SRSs) have recently been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, raising significant security concerns. In this work, we systematically investigate transformation and adversarial training based defenses for securing SRSs. According to the characteristic of SRSs, we present 22 diverse transformations and thoroughly evaluate them using 7 recent promising adversarial attacks (4 white-box and 3 black-box) on speaker recognition. With careful regard for best practices in defense evaluations, we analyze the strength of transformations to withstand adaptive attacks. We also evaluate and understand their effectiveness against adaptive attacks when combined with adversarial training. Our study provides lots of useful insights and findings, many of them are new or inconsistent with the conclusions in the image and speech recognition domains, e.g., variable and constant bit rate speech compressions have different performance, and some non-differentiable transformations remain effective against current promising evasion techniques which often work well in the image domain. We demonstrate that the proposed novel feature-level transformation combined with adversarial training is rather effective compared to the sole adversarial training in a complete white-box setting, e.g., increasing the accuracy by 13.62% and attack cost by two orders of magnitude, while other transformations do not necessarily improve the overall defense capability. This work sheds further light on the research directions in this field. We also release our evaluation platform SPEAKERGUARD to foster further research.

14.5SDJun 7, 2022
AS2T: Arbitrary Source-To-Target Adversarial Attack on Speaker Recognition Systems

Guangke Chen, Zhe Zhao, Fu Song et al.

Recent work has illuminated the vulnerability of speaker recognition systems (SRSs) against adversarial attacks, raising significant security concerns in deploying SRSs. However, they considered only a few settings (e.g., some combinations of source and target speakers), leaving many interesting and important settings in real-world attack scenarios alone. In this work, we present AS2T, the first attack in this domain which covers all the settings, thus allows the adversary to craft adversarial voices using arbitrary source and target speakers for any of three main recognition tasks. Since none of the existing loss functions can be applied to all the settings, we explore many candidate loss functions for each setting including the existing and newly designed ones. We thoroughly evaluate their efficacy and find that some existing loss functions are suboptimal. Then, to improve the robustness of AS2T towards practical over-the-air attack, we study the possible distortions occurred in over-the-air transmission, utilize different transformation functions with different parameters to model those distortions, and incorporate them into the generation of adversarial voices. Our simulated over-the-air evaluation validates the effectiveness of our solution in producing robust adversarial voices which remain effective under various hardware devices and various acoustic environments with different reverberation, ambient noises, and noise levels. Finally, we leverage AS2T to perform thus far the largest-scale evaluation to understand transferability among 14 diverse SRSs. The transferability analysis provides many interesting and useful insights which challenge several findings and conclusion drawn in previous works in the image domain. Our study also sheds light on future directions of adversarial attacks in the speaker recognition domain.

12.3CRSep 4, 2021Code
SEC4SR: A Security Analysis Platform for Speaker Recognition

Guangke Chen, Zhe Zhao, Fu Song et al.

Adversarial attacks have been expanded to speaker recognition (SR). However, existing attacks are often assessed using different SR models, recognition tasks and datasets, and only few adversarial defenses borrowed from computer vision are considered. Yet,these defenses have not been thoroughly evaluated against adaptive attacks. Thus, there is still a lack of quantitative understanding about the strengths and limitations of adversarial attacks and defenses. More effective defenses are also required for securing SR systems. To bridge this gap, we present SEC4SR, the first platform enabling researchers to systematically and comprehensively evaluate adversarial attacks and defenses in SR. SEC4SR incorporates 4 white-box and 2 black-box attacks, 24 defenses including our novel feature-level transformations. It also contains techniques for mounting adaptive attacks. Using SEC4SR, we conduct thus far the largest-scale empirical study on adversarial attacks and defenses in SR, involving 23 defenses, 15 attacks and 4 attack settings. Our study provides lots of useful findings that may advance future research: such as (1) all the transformations slightly degrade accuracy on benign examples and their effectiveness vary with attacks; (2) most transformations become less effective under adaptive attacks, but some transformations become more effective; (3) few transformations combined with adversarial training yield stronger defenses over some but not all attacks, while our feature-level transformation combined with adversarial training yields the strongest defense over all the attacks. Extensive experiments demonstrate capabilities and advantages of SEC4SR which can benefit future research in SR.