Prashant Kumar

CV
h-index3
4papers
14citations
Novelty68%
AI Score38

4 Papers

5.0RONov 29, 2023Code
GLiDR: Topologically Regularized Graph Generative Network for Sparse LiDAR Point Clouds

Prashant Kumar, Kshitij Madhav Bhat, Vedang Bhupesh Shenvi Nadkarni et al.

Sparse LiDAR point clouds cause severe loss of detail of static structures and reduce the density of static points available for navigation. Reduced density can be detrimental to navigation under several scenarios. We observe that despite high sparsity, in most cases, the global topology of LiDAR outlining the static structures can be inferred. We utilize this property to obtain a backbone skeleton of a LiDAR scan in the form of a single connected component that is a proxy to its global topology. We utilize the backbone to augment new points along static structures to overcome sparsity. Newly introduced points could correspond to existing static structures or to static points that were earlier obstructed by dynamic objects. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to use such a strategy for sparse LiDAR point clouds. Existing solutions close to our approach fail to identify and preserve the global static LiDAR topology and generate sub-optimal points. We propose GLiDR, a Graph Generative network that is topologically regularized using 0-dimensional Persistent Homology ($\mathcal{PH}$) constraints. This enables GLiDR to introduce newer static points along a topologically consistent global static LiDAR backbone. GLiDR generates precise static points using $32\times$ sparser dynamic scans and performs better than the baselines across three datasets. GLiDR generates a valuable byproduct - an accurate binary segmentation mask of static and dynamic objects that are helpful for navigation planning and safety in constrained environments. The newly introduced static points allow GLiDR to outperform LiDAR-based navigation using SLAM in several settings. Source code is available at https://kshitijbhat.github.io/glidr

3.6ROSep 17, 2023
Differentiable SLAM Helps Deep Learning-based LiDAR Perception Tasks

Prashant Kumar, Dheeraj Vattikonda, Vedang Bhupesh Shenvi Nadkarni et al. · mila

We investigate a new paradigm that uses differentiable SLAM architectures in a self-supervised manner to train end-to-end deep learning models in various LiDAR based applications. To the best of our knowledge there does not exist any work that leverages SLAM as a training signal for deep learning based models. We explore new ways to improve the efficiency, robustness, and adaptability of LiDAR systems with deep learning techniques. We focus on the potential benefits of differentiable SLAM architectures for improving performance of deep learning tasks such as classification, regression as well as SLAM. Our experimental results demonstrate a non-trivial increase in the performance of two deep learning applications - Ground Level Estimation and Dynamic to Static LiDAR Translation, when used with differentiable SLAM architectures. Overall, our findings provide important insights that enhance the performance of LiDAR based navigation systems. We demonstrate that this new paradigm of using SLAM Loss signal while training LiDAR based models can be easily adopted by the community.

6.2CVApr 3, 2025
SLACK: Attacking LiDAR-based SLAM with Adversarial Point Injections

Prashant Kumar, Dheeraj Vattikonda, Kshitij Madhav Bhat et al. · mila

The widespread adoption of learning-based methods for the LiDAR makes autonomous vehicles vulnerable to adversarial attacks through adversarial \textit{point injections (PiJ)}. It poses serious security challenges for navigation and map generation. Despite its critical nature, no major work exists that studies learning-based attacks on LiDAR-based SLAM. Our work proposes SLACK, an end-to-end deep generative adversarial model to attack LiDAR scans with several point injections without deteriorating LiDAR quality. To facilitate SLACK, we design a novel yet simple autoencoder that augments contrastive learning with segmentation-based attention for precise reconstructions. SLACK demonstrates superior performance on the task of \textit{point injections (PiJ)} compared to the best baselines on KITTI and CARLA-64 dataset while maintaining accurate scan quality. We qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrate PiJ attacks using a fraction of LiDAR points. It severely degrades navigation and map quality without deteriorating the LiDAR scan quality.

7.3CVMay 26, 2021Code
DSLR: Dynamic to Static LiDAR Scan Reconstruction Using Adversarially Trained Autoencoder

Prashant Kumar, Sabyasachi Sahoo, Vanshil Shah et al.

Accurate reconstruction of static environments from LiDAR scans of scenes containing dynamic objects, which we refer to as Dynamic to Static Translation (DST), is an important area of research in Autonomous Navigation. This problem has been recently explored for visual SLAM, but to the best of our knowledge no work has been attempted to address DST for LiDAR scans. The problem is of critical importance due to wide-spread adoption of LiDAR in Autonomous Vehicles. We show that state-of the art methods developed for the visual domain when adapted for LiDAR scans perform poorly. We develop DSLR, a deep generative model which learns a mapping between dynamic scan to its static counterpart through an adversarially trained autoencoder. Our model yields the first solution for DST on LiDAR that generates static scans without using explicit segmentation labels. DSLR cannot always be applied to real world data due to lack of paired dynamic-static scans. Using Unsupervised Domain Adaptation, we propose DSLR-UDA for transfer to real world data and experimentally show that this performs well in real world settings. Additionally, if segmentation information is available, we extend DSLR to DSLR-Seg to further improve the reconstruction quality. DSLR gives the state of the art performance on simulated and real-world datasets and also shows at least 4x improvement. We show that DSLR, unlike the existing baselines, is a practically viable model with its reconstruction quality within the tolerable limits for tasks pertaining to autonomous navigation like SLAM in dynamic environments.