Chen Xia

Ziyi Song, Chen Xia, Hang Yu et al.

Large-scale language models for autonomous driving enable enhanced global understanding and long-horizon planning. However, when deployed in isolated vehicles, limited sensing range and occlusions restrict reliable decision-making, and the substantial computational and latency overhead makes on-board deployment impractical. Cooperative driving provides a potential solution by leveraging external agents for information exchange, but existing methods remain limited in semantic reasoning capability under practical constraints. To address these challenges, we propose DH-VLM, a dual-horizon cooperative latent reasoning framework that enables asymmetric semantic cooperation between the infrastructure and ego vehicle. The infrastructure aggregates multi-layer hidden states to form a global-reasoning horizon latent guidance, which is integrated into the ego model through an Infrastructure-Driven Latent Evolution mechanism for conditional latent refinement. This enables the ego vehicle to leverage long-range contextual understanding while preserving autonomous decision-making within its local planning horizon. Furthermore, we construct a cooperation-oriented question-answer (QA) dataset covering fundamental scene understanding and ego-personalized comprehension to support counterfactual and safety-aware reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DH-VLM achieves state-of-the-art planning performance, outperforming the previous state of the art by 14.6% in L2 error and 26.9% in collision rate. Compared with query-based end-to-end cooperative driving methods, our approach reduces the communication cost by 57.3% and GPU memory usage by 25.5%, while maintaining strong robustness against infrastructure guidance errors, providing a practical and robust paradigm for cooperative autonomous driving.

Chen Xia, Zexi Kuang, Yuqing Hu

Large language model (LLM) agents offer a generative approach to simulating human behavior under conditions that may have few or no direct historical analogues, a common challenge in disaster and infrastructure-disruption planning. However, this generative capacity creates a validity problem: individually plausible agent reasoning may fail to reproduce empirical population behavior. We evaluate whether empirical grounding improves the statistical realism of LLM-agent simulations during disruptions. Specifically, we develop an empirically grounded LLM-agent framework that embeds demographic profiles from the American Community Survey, baseline routines from the American Time Use Survey, and urban spatial context into agent initialization, memory, decision prompts, and activity execution. An independent household survey conducted during the July 2024 Philadelphia heatwave is reserved as an external validation benchmark. Compared with an ungrounded LLM-agent baseline, the grounded model improved reconstruction of normal daily routines, increasing mean correlation with empirical activity profiles from 0.528 to 0.912 and reducing mean squared error from 0.066 to 0.008. Under heatwave conditions, the grounded model better reproduced survey-derived activity profiles, increasing mean correlation from 0.349 to 0.836 and reducing mean squared error from 0.098 to 0.012. The grounded model captured 46.4% of observed heatwave response amplitude, compared with 20.6% for the ungrounded baseline. These findings show that empirical grounding can make LLM agents more statistically credible simulators of population behavior while revealing remaining gaps in modeling human adaptation during disruptions.