Pengcheng Chen

Pengcheng Chen, Jin Ye, Guoan Wang et al. · pku

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals, and can be applied in various fields. In the medical field, LVLMs have a high potential to offer substantial assistance for diagnosis and treatment. Before that, it is crucial to develop benchmarks to evaluate LVLMs' effectiveness in various medical applications. Current benchmarks are often built upon specific academic literature, mainly focusing on a single domain, and lacking varying perceptual granularities. Thus, they face specific challenges, including limited clinical relevance, incomplete evaluations, and insufficient guidance for interactive LVLMs. To address these limitations, we developed the GMAI-MMBench, the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format. Additionally, we implemented a lexical tree structure that allows users to customize evaluation tasks, accommodating various assessment needs and substantially supporting medical AI research and applications. We evaluated 50 LVLMs, and the results show that even the advanced GPT-4o only achieves an accuracy of 53.96%, indicating significant room for improvement. Moreover, we identified five key insufficiencies in current cutting-edge LVLMs that need to be addressed to advance the development of better medical applications. We believe that GMAI-MMBench will stimulate the community to build the next generation of LVLMs toward GMAI.

Chao Ding, Mouxiao Bian, Pengcheng Chen et al.

Despite strong performance in medical question-answering, the clinical adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is critically hampered by their opaque 'black-box' reasoning, limiting clinician trust. This challenge is compounded by the predominant reliance of current medical LLMs on corpora from scientific literature or synthetic data, which often lack the granular expert validation and high clinical relevance essential for advancing their specialized medical capabilities. To address these critical gaps, we introduce a highly clinically relevant dataset with 31,247 medical question-answer pairs, each accompanied by expert-validated chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations. This resource, spanning multiple clinical domains, was curated via a scalable human-LLM hybrid pipeline: LLM-generated rationales were iteratively reviewed, scored, and refined by medical experts against a structured rubric, with substandard outputs revised through human effort or guided LLM regeneration until expert consensus. This publicly available dataset provides a vital source for the development of medical LLMs that capable of transparent and verifiable reasoning, thereby advancing safer and more interpretable AI in medicine.

Nicole M. Gunderson, Graham J. Harris, Jeremy S. Ruthberg et al.

Purpose: Incomplete dissection is a common cause of persistent disease and revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in chronic rhinosinusitis. Current image-guided surgery systems typically reference static preoperative CT (pCT), and do not model evolving resection boundaries. We present Virtual Intraoperative CT (viCT), a method for sequentially updating pCT throughout ESS using intraoperative 3D reconstructions from monocular endoscopic video to enable visualization of evolving anatomy in CT format. Methods: Monocular endoscopic video is processed using a depth-supervised NeRF framework with virtual stereo synthesis to generate metrically scaled 3D reconstructions at multiple surgical intervals. Reconstructions undergo rigid, landmark-based registration in 3D Slicer guided by anatomical correspondences, and are then voxelized into the pCT grid. viCT volumes were generated using a ray-based occupancy comparison between pCT and reconstruction to delete outdated voxels and remap preserved anatomy and updated boundaries. Performance is evaluated in a cadaveric feasibility study of four specimens across four ESS stages using volumetric overlap (DSC, Jaccard) and surface metrics (HD95, Chamfer, MSD, RMSD), and qualitative comparisons to ground-truth CT. Results: viCT updates show agreement with ground-truth anatomy across surgical stages, with submillimeter mean surface errors. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) = 0.88 +/- 0.05 and Jaccard Index = 0.79 +/- 0.07, and Hausdorff Distance 95% (HD95) = 0.69 +/- 0.28 mm, Chamfer Distance = 0.09 +/- 0.05 mm, Mean Surface Distance (MSD) = 0.11 +/- 0.05 mm, and Root Mean Square Distance (RMSD) = 0.32 +/- 0.10 mm. Conclusion: viCT enables CT-format anatomic updating in an ESS setting without ancillary hardware. Future work will focus on fully automating registration, validation in live cases, and optimizing runtime for real-time deployment.