Quntian Fang

Xinyue Fang, Zhen Huang, Zhiliang Tian et al.

LLMs obtain remarkable performance but suffer from hallucinations. Most research on detecting hallucination focuses on the questions with short and concrete correct answers that are easy to check the faithfulness. Hallucination detections for text generation with open-ended answers are more challenging. Some researchers use external knowledge to detect hallucinations in generated texts, but external resources for specific scenarios are hard to access. Recent studies on detecting hallucinations in long text without external resources conduct consistency comparison among multiple sampled outputs. To handle long texts, researchers split long texts into multiple facts and individually compare the consistency of each pairs of facts. However, these methods (1) hardly achieve alignment among multiple facts; (2) overlook dependencies between multiple contextual facts. In this paper, we propose a graph-based context-aware (GCA) hallucination detection for text generations, which aligns knowledge facts and considers the dependencies between contextual knowledge triples in consistency comparison. Particularly, to align multiple facts, we conduct a triple-oriented response segmentation to extract multiple knowledge triples. To model dependencies among contextual knowledge triple (facts), we construct contextual triple into a graph and enhance triples' interactions via message passing and aggregating via RGCN. To avoid the omission of knowledge triples in long text, we conduct a LLM-based reverse verification via reconstructing the knowledge triples. Experiments show that our model enhances hallucination detection and excels all baselines.

Xinyue Fang, Zhiliang Tian, Zhen Huang et al.

Existing LLM hallucination mitigation methods, including prompt engineering and model optimization, either hardly alter models'internal knowledge or have poor cross-domain generalization. Contrastive decoding mitigates hallucinations by using layer-wise differences in LLMs. However, prior studies only explore transformer-based models (e.g., GPT), ignoring other effective frameworks like mixture-of-experts (MoE) models. Since MoE alters the traditional transformer architecture, we conduct empirical studies to investigate whether similar layer-wise differences exist in MoEs. Our results show that they do not exist in MoE with shared experts; nevertheless, across different MoEs, higher layers exhibit distinct expert activation patterns between factual and non-factual outputs. Building on these, we propose EAACD, an expert-aware adaptive contrast decoding that uses expert differences in MoE's higher layers to mitigate hallucinations on QA tasks. EAACD splits high-layer experts into a higher-reliability group and several lower-reliability groups based on their confidence and consistency. It contrasts the higher-reliability group's prediction with each lower-reliability group's prediction to calibrate the model's original predictions. To strengthen this contrast, EAACD amplifies hallucinations from lower-reliability experts via attention and masking to provide stronger negative references. EAACD outperforms all baselines on four datasets.