Ju Huang

Zihe Liu, Jiashun Liu, Yancheng He et al.

Reinforcement learning for LLM reasoning has rapidly emerged as a prominent research area, marked by a significant surge in related studies on both algorithmic innovations and practical applications. Despite this progress, several critical challenges remain, including the absence of standardized guidelines for employing RL techniques and a fragmented understanding of their underlying mechanisms. Additionally, inconsistent experimental settings, variations in training data, and differences in model initialization have led to conflicting conclusions, obscuring the key characteristics of these techniques and creating confusion among practitioners when selecting appropriate techniques. This paper systematically reviews widely adopted RL techniques through rigorous reproductions and isolated evaluations within a unified open-source framework. We analyze the internal mechanisms, applicable scenarios, and core principles of each technique through fine-grained experiments, including datasets of varying difficulty, model sizes, and architectures. Based on these insights, we present clear guidelines for selecting RL techniques tailored to specific setups, and provide a reliable roadmap for practitioners navigating the RL for the LLM domain. Finally, we reveal that a minimalist combination of two techniques can unlock the learning capability of critic-free policies using vanilla PPO loss. The results demonstrate that our simple combination consistently improves performance, surpassing strategies like GRPO and DAPO.

Yuntong Chen, Jianyu Liu, Guobin Zhao et al.

Trustworthy deployment of AI-based diagnosis in safety-critical mechanical systems hinges on validation: whether a prediction can be checked against physical reality before it is acted upon. Current intelligent fault diagnosers fail this standard in two ways. Their standard output, a class label with a softmax confidence score, is an internal statistic of the classifier, offering nothing checkable against independent physical knowledge; and the growing use of generative language models in maintenance reporting adds a second risk: hallucinated content entering reports on which decisions rest. Taking bearing fault diagnosis as the testbed, this work addresses both problems from the output side. The proposed Diagnostic Evidence Network (DENet) is an encoder-agnostic multi-task framework extending the output to a structured evidence record: the classification, a predicted characteristic frequency comparable against the theoretical value determined by bearing geometry and shaft speed, and a temporal localization of transient impulses inspectable on the raw waveform. Across four encoders and three public datasets, this evidence incurs no statistically significant accuracy cost, with a frequency error of about 6 Hz on 1,024-point segments where spectral estimation is structurally inapplicable. Centrally, the deviation between predicted and theoretical frequency constitutes a label-free, inference-time validation signal: it detects misclassifications with AUROC values of 0.970 and 0.871, and remains discriminative in the high-confidence regime where confidence-derived detectors are blind. Finally, a QLoRA-adapted language model is constrained to translate, but never generate, diagnostic content, reducing unsupported-claim rates from 10-12% to 2% and eliminating fabricated quantities.