Vu N. Duong

Duc Minh Nguyen, Bao-Ngoc Dao, Tung M. Luu et al.

Diffusion-based Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies enable strong generalization in robotic manipulation, but remain sensitive to spurious visual correlations and noisy action generation, leading to brittle behavior under perturbations. We introduce Selected Diffusion Noise (SDN), a simple, training-free test-time method that improves both robustness and success rate by leveraging the diffusion noise space as a controllable degree of freedom. SDN dynamically samples noise vectors that are maximally separated from a reference set to mitigate reliance on spurious cues, while selecting candidates that yield more coherent action trajectories. This dual objective encourages stable behavior even under object-masked observations and reduces action jitter without modifying model parameters. We evaluate SDN on two simulation benchmarks (Google Robot, Widow-X) and two real-world robotic datasets across multiple VLA policies, including pi_0, Groot-N1.5, and Groot-N1.6. SDN consistently improves success rates by +8% in simulation and +10% in real-world settings, while producing smoother and more stable actions. Our results highlight that diffusion noise selection can serve as an effective and general mechanism for enhancing VLA policies at test time.

Minh-Loi Nguyen, Nghiem Tuong Diep, Hung Khang Nguyen et al.

Recent advances in robot world models enable synthetic video generation for embodied prediction and planning. However, evaluating these videos is challenging: visually realistic outputs often violate physical laws, temporal consistency, or task logic, while conventional metrics and monolithic Vision-Language Model (VLM) judges fail to generalize or provide precise diagnostic value. We present RoboGaze, a training-free, multi-agent VLM framework that provides structured, interpretable evaluation for generated robot-manipulation videos. Given a task instruction and video, RoboGaze operates via a three-stage pipeline: task-scene grounding, dimension-specific specialist routing, and critic-based verification. It outputs temporally localized glitch reports categorized under a novel 6-dimension, 30-type robotics-specific taxonomy. To benchmark RoboGaze, we introduce a human-validated dataset of 382 clips spanning simulated and real-world multi-view manipulation. Evaluating eight open-source and proprietary VLM backbones, RoboGaze dramatically outperforms zero-shot baselines, improving description-F1 by up to +43 points and temporal alignment (F1 x IoU) by up to +37 points, closing approximately 85% of the gap to the human ceiling. Furthermore, its critic verifier mitigates the "cry-wolf" false-positive flaw of standard VLMs, lifting clean-clip accuracy from under 25% to over 80%. RoboGaze offers a scalable, highly interpretable diagnostic tool for the rigorous evaluation of robot world models.

Yujing Chang, Yash Guleria, Duc-Thinh Pham et al.

Air Traffic Control (ATC) is a safety-critical domain in which incorrect interpretation of instructions may lead to severe operational consequences. While large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong general performance, their reliability in operational ATC environments remains unclear. Existing evaluation approaches, largely based on aggregate metrics such as F1 or macro accuracy, treat all errors uniformly and fail to account for the asymmetric consequences of high-risk semantic mistakes (e.g., incorrect runway identifiers or movement constraints). To address this gap, we propose a safety-oriented, consequence-aware evaluation framework tailored to ATC operations. Our results reveal that while current LLMs achieve reasonable aggregate accuracy, their operational reliability is severely limited. Evaluated on clean transcripts, the peak Risk Score reaches only 0.69, with most models scoring below 0.6 despite high macro-F1 performance. Further analysis shows that errors concentrate in high-impact entities despite relatively stable action-type classification, indicating structural grounding deficiencies. These findings highlight the necessity of consequence-aware evaluation protocols for the responsible deployment of AI-assisted ATC systems.