Bing Hao

Yunlong Chu, Minglai Shao, Yuhang Liu et al.

Explicit Chain-of-Thought improves the reasoning performance of large language models but often incurs high inference cost due to verbose token-level traces. While recent approaches reduce this overhead via concise prompting or step pruning, they largely truncate what the model says rather than internalize what the model thinks. Latent reasoning offers a promising alternative by performing computation in the hidden space, yet prior methods face two critical challenges. Many existing approaches rely on rigid point-to-point alignment, forcing a latent token to approximate the final representation of a reasoning step, which can be insufficient to capture the dense, variable-length semantics of an entire reasoning segment. Furthermore, these methods often suffer from a lack of interpretability: latent states are commonly produced by unconstrained optimization or embedding mixing, yielding vectors that are difficult to decode or audit under the pretrained language head. We propose SPOT, a flexible framework that compresses explicit CoT into compact latent pause tokens without enforcing a fixed response template. At the core of SPOT is Span-level Semantic Alignment, a Sinkhorn optimal-transport objective that softly matches each pause token to the semantics of an entire reasoning segment, overcoming the rigidity of step-end alignment. To further improve interpretability, SPOT introduces a Frozen-Head Decoding Constraint that keeps latent states directly decodable as token distributions under the frozen pretrained LM head, enabling readable keyword interpretations of latent thoughts. Experiments on reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SPOT improves accuracy by 2.3 points on average while reducing generated tokens by 37.5% and provides faithful semantic interpretations of the latent reasoning process.

Yuhang Liu, Ruijie Wang, Yunlong Chu et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at multi-step reasoning, yet increasing the structural complexity of inference does not consistently improve system-level returns. Methods such as Tree of Thoughts (ToT), Graph of Thoughts (GoT), and Adaptive Graph of Thoughts (AGoT) can boost accuracy on some benchmarks, but often introduce substantial overhead in token consumption and latency, and their gains can be unstable across task distributions-sometimes underperforming simpler Chain-of-Thought (CoT) or direct input-output prompting (IO). We attribute this inefficiency to stage-wise and node-wise heterogeneity inside GoT-style reasoning pipelines: high-quality planning and final synthesis are globally coupled and typically benefit from strong models, whereas many intermediate subtasks are localized and can be solved accurately by lighter models with far fewer tokens. Motivated by these observations, we propose RouteGoT, a budget-controllable, node-adaptive routing framework for graph-structured reasoning. RouteGoT performs in-graph routing by prioritizing strong models for planning and synthesis, while dynamically allocating lightweight models and cost-effective strategies to leaf subtasks based on predicted difficulty. It further integrates explicit budget constraints into a global inference scheduler to control graph expansion under a user-specified token budget, enabling predictable performance-cost trade-offs. Experiments across reasoning, retrieval, and multi-hop QA benchmarks show that RouteGoT matching or improving accuracy while substantially reducing token usage; specifically, it achieves an average 8.1 percentage points accuracy improvement and 79.1\% output token reduction compared to AGoT. Furthermore, RouteGoT outperforms existing routing baselines by maintaining a superior cost-accuracy trade-off, demonstrating improved robustness under varying budget targets and tasks.