Ivano Ciardelli

Juha Kontinen, Ivano Ciardelli

Inquisitive team logic is a variant of inquisitive logic interpreted in team semantics, which has been argued to provide a natural setting for the regimentation of dependence claims. With respect to sentences, this logic is known to be expressively equivalent with first-order logic. In this article we show that, on the contrary, the expressive power of open formulas in this logic properly exceeds that of first-order logic. On the way to this result, we show that if inquisitive team logic is extended with the range-generating universal quantifier adopted in dependence logic, the resulting logic can express finiteness; as a consequence, this logic is not compact and has non-arithmetic complexity. We further extend our results to standard inquisitive first-order logic, showing that some sentences of this logic express non first-order properties of models, thus settling an open problem from the literature.

Ivano Ciardelli

We introduce inquisitive action logic, InqAL, a multi-agent modal logic for reasoning about action. While traditional approaches focus on what properties of the outcome an agent can force, InqAL also captures what aspects of the outcome an agent determines through their actions. As we argue, such claims of agentive determination are naturally analyzed as modal claims involving questions. Technically, InqAL is a multi-agent extension of inquisitive neighborhood logic based on concurrent game structures. With respect to statements, it is expressively equivalent to the individual-agent fragment of the socially friendly coalition logic recently proposed by Goranko and Enqvist. We present an axiomatization of InqAL and prove completeness and decidability via the finite model property. Along the way, we establish a representation theorem for actual effectivity functions, associating to an agent the sets of outcomes corresponding to their possible actions; we give exact conditions under which a multi-agent neighborhood frame arises from a concurrent game structure.

Ivano Ciardelli, Simone Conti

In recent work, an inquisitive first-order modal logic has been proposed to reason about relations of modal dependence, including the notion of global supervenience (functional dependence among the extensions of predicates relative to a space of possibilities). At present, no proof system exists for this logic. We provide a complete labelled sequent calculus, extending a calculus developed by Litak and Sano for a weak version of inquisitive first-order logic. We prove strong completeness for the calculus and show that it enjoys desirable structural properties, including the invertibility of its rules and the admissibility of cut.