Shunan Dong

Yuchen Fan, Minghong Sun, Jikui Ma et al.

AI and HPC infrastructure increasingly serves workload portfolios that combine dense tensor computation, sparse kernels, large memory footprints, and communication-intensive collectives. Supporting these portfolios requires coordinated choices across accelerators, memory tiers, scale-up fabrics, and cluster networks. The resulting Cross-layer Heterogeneous System (XHS) design space is difficult to explore: hardware choices change legal task mappings, while rack power, switch radix, cabling, and cost constraints invalidate many candidates. We present CHASE, an application-driven framework that searches physically feasible XHS architectures through the workloads they must execute. CHASE represents candidates as hierarchical typed graphs and rejects designs that violate deployment constraints. It avoids intractable joint hardware-mapping search with a decoupled two-level loop: an inner mapper translates hardware-independent workload DAGs into topology-aware event traces, a calibrated event-driven simulator evaluates each mapping, and an outer telemetry-guided optimizer evolves the hardware graph. We evaluate CHASE on sparse-computing and LLM workloads. Its mapper remains within 6.06% of exhaustive optima while reducing mapping time by 60.5% on average relative to PEFT. Compute-model errors average 4.4-7.5%, and communication validation reproduces key trends across physical platforms. The outer search reaches near-global optima within 64 iterations. End-to-end case studies show that sparse workloads favor criticality-aware heterogeneous pods, whereas LLM inference favors scale-up islands; the resulting designs deliver 6.20$\times$ and 2.12$\times$ geomean speedups, respectively, while reducing cost and power relative to the baselines.

Yujin Wang, Junli Chen, Yixuan Li et al.

Embodied foundation models have recently been widely used to improve robot generalization and task success rates. Previous works apply lossy efficient-inference techniques such as quantization, pruning, and asynchronous inference, accepting small action quality degradation in exchange for lower per-step computation cost and inter-action latency. However, unlike traditional static ML tasks, embodied tasks involve repeated interaction with the environment, and task-level performance is determined not only by per-step cost, but also by closed-loop effects unique to embodied execution, which remain insufficiently characterized in current efficient-inference studies. In this work, we propose TISED (\underline{T}ask-level \underline{I}nference \underline{S}peedup \underline{E}ffect \underline{D}ecomposition), an analytical framework that unifies diverse lossy inference optimization techniques and decomposes their effects on static and dynamic tasks, and uncovers some paradoxical effects on task-level performance: (1) on \textit{static tasks}, optimization sometimes can lengthen end-to-end per-task completion time even as per-step latency drops; (2) on \textit{dynamic tasks}, moderate lossy optimization can raise task success rate even above the baseline; and (3) the monotonicity and sweet-spot location of both effects can shift with hardware configuration. Together, our findings provide a new perspective on adapting inference optimization techniques to embodied tasks.