Kun Zhang

Peiyuan Zhu, Shaoan Xie, Zijian Li et al.

Contrastive pre-training has propelled video-text alignment, yet models often inherit the critical limitations of their image-text predecessors like CLIP, resulting in entangled representations. These challenges are severely exacerbated by two fundamental properties in the video domain: Temporal Misalignment, where textual descriptions often correlate only to specific, constrained temporal windows, leaving other frames text-irrelevant; and Semantic Asymmetry, which dictates a sparse, bidirectional, and non-equivalent relevance between frame-level visual details and caption-level concepts. This failure persists whether captions are short and temporally disjoint, creating ambiguity, or long and detailed, fostering entanglement between static objects and their temporal evolution. In this paper, we establish theoretical conditions that enable flexible alignment between video and text representations across the temporal dimension and at varying levels of granularity. Building on these theoretical insights, we introduce MoVA, Modular Long Video-Text Alignment, which learns dual asymmetric projections: a text-side projection that adaptively selects frame-aware subspaces of the caption, and a video-side projection that disentangles text-relevant visual concepts. Our framework ensures that the model can preserve global cross-modal semantics while disentangling evolving, frame-specific concepts and scale naturally to long captions and videos. Empirical evaluations show that MoVA outperforms existing methods in multiple video-text alignment tasks, demonstrating the effectiveness of our method.

Xiangchen Song, Zhenhao Chen, Lingjing Kong et al.

Large language model test-time training (TTT) is often evaluated through local proxy metrics: models are updated on recent tokens, retrieved context, target-domain data, or verifiable task attempts, and then judged by perplexity, future-token loss, long-context performance, or reward. These metrics are well matched to claims about stream adaptation, domain adaptation, context compression, and reward-backed test-time improvement. They are weaker evidence, however, for a capability that TTT results are increasingly used to motivate: deployed assistant memory, personalization, or sparse post-deployment learning, which instead requires behavioral evidence such as later recall, paraphrase robustness, retention, locality, conflict handling, and use in downstream actions after the original support context is removed. We introduce a behavioral evaluation framework that calibrates TTT memory claims to the evidence that supports them. It has two components: a claim-calibrated evidence ladder that separates stream/domain adaptation, bridge internalization, and deployment-time behavioral learning; and an evaluation protocol with matched explicit-memory baselines and mutually exclusive failure categories. We validate the framework by auditing recent TTT and memory-adjacent work and by instantiating it as a controlled diagnostic in which, in a sparse nonce-fact setting, one-step LoRA updates lower support and answer loss across three Qwen3 model scales while generated free-form recall stays at zero, exposing a measurable gap between proxy improvement and deployment behavior. The framework gives authors and evaluators a concrete standard for aligning TTT memory claims with the evidence actually reported.