Junjie Chen

Honglin Shu, Zhao Tian, Dong Wang et al.

Mutation testing is a powerful technique for ensuring software quality. However, the presence of equivalent mutants introduces unnecessary costs and biases, limiting its practical effectiveness. Although numerous equivalent mutant detection (EMD) methods have been proposed, they often face distinct challenges: pure-code analysis methods can be limited by their reliance on specific compiler infrastructures, while existing machine-learning approaches remain constrained by scarce training data and limited generalization to unseen mutants. Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse code-related tasks by better capturing program semantics. Yet their potential for EMD remains largely unexplored, particularly in the multi-lingual context. This paper presents the first comprehensive empirical study on LLMs for EMD, using 3,302 Java and 1,088 C mutant pairs to benchmark against state-of-the-art methods, explore strategy variations, assess efficiency, and evaluate cross-lingual generalization. Experimental results show that LLM-based approaches achieve higher F1-scores than the evaluated traditional methods, with fine-tuned code embedding yielding the highest detection accuracy among the tested strategies. Moreover, LLM-based approaches strike a practical balance between effectiveness and efficiency with inference times comparable to existing machine-learning models. Importantly, fine-tuned LLMs demonstrate measurable generalization across programming languages. These findings establish LLMs as a viable and efficient approach for tackling the longstanding challenge of equivalent mutant detection, offering new directions for advancing mutation testing in practice.

Haichi Wang, Ruiguo Yu, Yesong Pang et al.

Debugging the Linux kernel remains a formidable challenge due to its vast codebase, complex architecture, and low-level programming intricacies. Effective fault localization (FL) is thus essential for efficient kernel debugging and maintenance. While existing FL techniques (both traditional and LLM-based) have shown promise in general-purpose software, they are ill-suited for the kernel context. In particular, recent LLM-based techniques often treat bug reports and source code as plain text, lacking deep integration of kernel-specific knowledge, which limits their ability to identify root causes and achieve fine-grained localization. We present CoHiKer, a novel LLM-based FL technique tailored to the Linux kernel. CoHiKer introduces two key innovations: (1) contrastive reasoning, which identifies root causes by analyzing the behavioral divergence between carefully mutated passing and failing test cases, and (2) hierarchical context analysis, which systematically narrows the localization scope from files to methods by integrating crash reports, syscall semantics, inter-file dependencies, and kernel-specific features. Unlike prior techniques that rely on static understanding and full-code input, CoHiKer decomposes the localization task and enables structured LLM prompting to reason semantically over meaningful contexts. We evaluate CoHiKer on an extended Linux kernel bug dataset against five state-of-the-art baselines. CoHiKer consistently outperforms all competitors, improving Top-1 localization accuracy by up to 26.07% at the file level and 56.85% at the method level over state-of-the-art LLM-based baselines, while achieving up to 8.84% and 28.9% reductions in token consumption, respectively. Furthermore, CoHiKer demonstrates strong generalizability on the non-kernel dataset, with comparable gains (15.5% and 5.3% in Top-1 at file and method levels).

Zhao Tian, Yingquan Zhao, Chenyao Suo et al.

LLVM is a widely used compiler infrastructure whose scale and complexity make issue resolution labor-intensive and challenging. Although large language models (LLMs) have recently achieved remarkable success in issue resolution, their effectiveness on complex system-level LLVM compiler remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, we introduce LLVM-Bench, the first large-scale benchmark for LLVM issue resolution, containing 423 real-world, validated tasks collected from the LLVM project. We further develop LLVM-Gym, a scalable evaluation platform that automates issue reproduction, patch application, compiler building, and test execution. Using LLVM-Bench and LLVM-Gym, we conduct a comprehensive study of four representative LLMs, six retrieval configurations, and three agents. Our results show that current LLM-based issue resolution techniques remain limited on LLVM-Bench, with patch invalidity and build failures as the dominant failure modes. We further reveal a strong complementarity among different LLMs and agents, motivating LLVM-Ens, a lightweight ensemble approach that expands the patch space through integrating the patches generated by diverse techniques, filters incorrect and redundant candidates, and identifies the most promising solution. Our results show that LLVM-Ens achieves a resolution rate of up to 21.99%, further improving LLVM issue resolution.