Yongqiang Chen

Zhenhao Chen, Yongqiang Chen, Chenxi Liu et al.

Building AI Scientist agents with Large Language Models (LLMs) has recently attracted growing attention. Since scientific discovery fundamentally relies on uncovering causal relationships from observations, the capability of causal thinking, i.e., distinguishing causation from correlation and recognizing hidden biases, is essential to LLM agents. Although a number of benchmarks exist for AI Scientists, none explicitly incorporate challenges from selection bias, measurement error, and hidden confounders that widely exist in real-world scientific discovery. To this end, we present CausalGame, a benchmark that evaluates the causal thinking capabilities of LLM agents through interactive games. CausalGame asks LLM agents to actively design experimental protocols, collect observation data, and derive a final solution with an explanation report. To emulate realistic scientific discovery challenges, we design 14 scenarios that incorporate selection bias, measurement error, and hidden confounders. Across 30 LLM agents, none demonstrates reliable causal thinking: the best model reaches only 68.0% survival against analytical optima of 78-85%, and merely 5-7% of sessions receive credits on the causal-reasoning rubrics. CausalGame provides a scalable and controlled testbed for evaluating the causal thinking of AI Scientist agents.

Fan Feng, Yujia Zheng, Minghao Fu et al.

Learning and planning in imagination using world models provides an effective paradigm for training agents for decision-making. However, existing approaches often rely on high-dimensional latent spaces or generic visual embeddings that retain many factors irrelevant to control, limiting efficiency and generalization across tasks. To this end, we study how agents can learn world models with representations that are task-specific, minimal, and sufficient for decision-making. We achieve this via a closed-loop synergy between the agent and the world model, in which structured world-model learning distills task-sufficient representations from informative interaction data. On the agent side, agents actively probe the environment to collect informative trajectories that expose task-relevant latent factors, guided by an adaptive curriculum. On the world-model side, we learn structured representations over observations to distill compact, task-sufficient latent states from the collected interaction data. This synergy enables the empirical recovery of task-sufficient latent representations that capture all control-relevant factors. Leveraging these representations, the resulting policies achieve improved sample efficiency and generalization, including generalization across skills, object-skill compositions, and previously unseen tasks on standard continuous-control and robotic-manipulation benchmarks.

Garry Yang, Zizhe Chen, Xinru Chen et al.

LLM-powered agents struggle with personalization when users issue raw, underspecified queries. In this setting, agents must infer latent intent, extract preferences from noisy interaction histories, and select among competing alternatives. Existing benchmarks rarely test this capability, as they often rely on user-refined queries or simplified histories. We introduce personalized product search (PPS), a testbed for agentic personalization under raw queries and diverse histories. We construct Agent Personalized Benchmark (APeB) from action logs, pairing underspecified intents with rich histories and user-viewed candidate items. Evaluating state-of-the-art LLMs with multi-step agent workflows, we find that models handle explicit queries well but struggle with early-stage queries requiring intent and preference discovery. Rubric analysis attributes this gap mainly to ineffective history use. A simple history-aware query-refinement pipeline, VQRA, yields consistent gains, highlighting the need for dedicated history-utilization modules in personalized agents.