Tongtong Cao

Jinbang Huang, Yuanzhao Hu, Zhiyuan Li et al.

Long-horizon robotic tasks require diverse capabilities that no single policy can reliably provide. Heterogeneous policies offer complementary strengths, but orchestrating them requires reasoning over uncertain capability boundaries and cross-policy distribution mismatch, which are largely overlooked by existing planning methods built on homogeneous, predefined skills with fixed applicability. We propose RoboHarness, a unified framework that encapsulates independently developed robot control systems as reusable agentic skills. Although instantiated in this work with VLAs, RL policies, and task-and-motion planning (TAMP) systems, RoboHarness is designed as a general framework compatible with a broader range of robot policies, such as navigation policies, model predictive controllers, and world-action models. RoboHarness uses multi-modal execution memory and online evidence to characterize policy capability boundaries for capability-aware decomposition and routing. To stabilize policy handoffs, its Memory Bridge retrieves execution trajectories associated with the next policy, estimates its in-distribution state region, and guides the robot toward that region without joint policy retraining. Extensive experiments on three public benchmarks, 500 customized tasks, and 135 real-robot experiments demonstrate effective capability-aware routing and stable policy orchestration, yielding substantial improvements in zero-shot long-horizon planning and out-of-distribution robustness.

Lingfeng Zhang, Zhanguang Zhang, Liheng Ma et al.

End-to-end vision-language navigation (VLN) with causal vision-language models can map instructions and egocentric observations directly to actions, but standard behavior cloning supervises only the next action and does not explicitly train the policy state to be predictive of future visual outcomes. We first ask a diagnostic question: if the policy is given an expert-trajectory future image as privileged input at training and testing time, is that additional visual evidence useful for choosing the current action? (These expert-trajectory future images are unavailable at test time in real deployment, so we use this setting only as a privileged-input diagnostic.) The answer is yes; this sanity check shows that future observations can provide rich, actionable cues. We then ask a deployable question: without accessing future images at inference, can we still benefit from future information by using a compressed future visual latent only as training supervision? We propose Future-State-Conditioned VLN (FSC-VLN), which adds a future-query token and aligns its hidden state to a frozen visual embedding $Δ$ steps ahead via a training-only target branch that is removed after training. On R2R val-unseen, FSC-VLN improves SR/OSR/SPL over a StreamVLN-style baseline under two training-data regimes, with larger gains on long-horizon episodes; ablations further support the dual-query design (separating future and action queries).