Zhi Chen

Songshuo Lu, Zhi Chen, Yaohua Tang

A single reinforcement-learning run can produce a strong reasoner yet an incomplete teacher: it often amplifies only a subset of the valid solution modes. We argue that reinforcement learning (RL)-trained policies should therefore be viewed as local probes of a multi-basin reasoning solution manifold, rather than as globally reliable supervisors. Based on this view, we propose an expand-then-compress framework that couples teacher construction with multi-teacher policy distillation. In the expansion stage, Residual Group Relative Policy Optimization (RGRPO) trains a sequence of teachers from a common initialization and redirects each later round toward examples not yet covered by the accumulated teacher union. In the compression stage, reliability-gated Teacher-Union On-policy Distillation (TU-OPD) lets the student learn from its own response prefixes. For each example, only reliable teachers contribute, and their sampled-token OPD losses are weighted by their per-example quality. We further introduce Consensus-Residual Decomposition, which preserves a winner teacher's excess token preferences over its reliable peers, preventing specialist behavior from being suppressed during teacher aggregation. Experiments on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and instruction following show that the resulting Qwen3-1.7B student consistently outperforms the strongest individual teacher across all three domains, yielding relative improvements of 2.0%, 8.3%, and 6.9%, respectively, while retaining single-model inference. These results establish a simple but powerful principle: stronger students can be obtained not by selecting a single better teacher, but by deliberately constructing and compressing a complementary teacher union.

Zhi Chen, Minmao Wang, Xingchen Liu et al.

Semantic-ID-based generative recommenders enable efficient next-item generation, but their item-level supervision mainly captures behavioral co-occurrence and local transitions. Large language models (LLMs) can complement these models by reasoning over heterogeneous interaction histories to understand the user's current demand. However, LLMs are not inherently trained with recommendation-specific outcome feedback, and linguistically plausible reasoning therefore does not necessarily lead to effective recommendation decisions. We term this mismatch the Understanding-Action Gap. Accordingly, we distinguish intent knowledge, which captures the user's current demand, from policy knowledge, which specifies the recommendation direction and rejection boundary under that demand. To bridge this gap, we propose a feedback-driven agent framework that first induces task-oriented intent and then discovers recommendation policies according to their incremental utility over an intent-only baseline. Candidate policies are evaluated and refined using outcome-derived feedback rather than linguistic plausibility. We further transfer the resulting intent and policy knowledge into two latent tokens of a lightweight Semantic-ID generator through dual-space relational distillation, enabling LLM-free online inference. Experiments on public benchmarks show consistent improvements over baselines, while large-scale online A/B tests achieve gains of 4.506% in Revenue and 4.621% in ADVV.