Cong Wang

Weixiang Zhou, Xingguo Xu, Yuhao Wang et al.

Multi-modal object Re-Identification (ReID) aims to retrieve target instances by leveraging complementary information across modalities. However, existing methods suffer from two challenges. First, they often fail to exploit well-aligned and reliable semantic priors, making them vulnerable to background clutter and cross-modal misalignment. On the other hand, they typically rely on holistic feature modeling, overlooking the synergy between global and local representations. To overcome these limitations, we propose a robust multi-modal ReID framework with dual semantic guidance and global-local mutual modulation, which mainly consists of three key components, namely the Text-Semantic Injector (TSI), the Masked Global-Local Modulator (MGLM), and the Hierarchical MoE Fusion (HMF). The TSI enhances semantic awareness by integrating clean and coherent textual features into visual tokens. The MGLM enables part-aware cross-modal interaction through joint guidance from soft masks and global context, improving fine-grained feature alignment. Finally, the HMF adaptively aggregates multi-spectral features under local semantic supervision, yielding discriminative and robust representations. Extensive experiments on three multi-modal ReID benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/zw-absin/DSGM upon acceptance.

Blaise Delattre, Cong Wang, Yang Cao

Tool-using LLM agents act on typed tool returns, records pairing provenance and categorical fields with numerical values. Runtime permission gates generally authorize the observed return and action, leaving the decision unprotected against small errors in how the return was bound to its source. We ask whether a candidate action stays authorized over a declared neighborhood of plausible correctly bound returns: one admissible binding fault plus bounded numerical drift. We prove that certifying the categorical and numerical channels separately does not compose: perturbations that are safe on each channel alone can jointly turn the same action unsafe. CAGE certifies this joint neighborhood directly, enumerating the discrete branches exactly and certifying the continuous perturbation within each branch. Across synthetic, policy-as-code, regulatory, and real-transaction settings, CAGE removes the in-budget false allows that accurate pointwise gates admit, while keeping a useful fraction of decisions autonomous. When the policy is executable, CAGE-Exact certifies the policy itself; otherwise CAGE-Lip and CAGE-RS certify a learned gate under an explicit, measured fidelity assumption.

Jian Yu, Fei Shen, Cong Wang et al.

Although Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising safety performance, extending them to Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) exposes a significant gap between expanded multimodal capabilities and existing safety mechanisms. Current defenses remain predominantly confined to specific modal settings, thereby limiting their robustness against broader cross-modal threats. To bridge this gap, we introduce SafeNexus, a cross-modal safety alignment framework that adopts a dedicated neuron-level intervention strategy. First, we formulate a neuron localization paradigm that identifies functionally specialized neurons by characterizing intermediate-layer activation patterns and quantifying their functional salience through importance scoring. Building upon this paradigm, we exploit contrastive data to identify modality-bound safety neurons (BS-Neurons), and validate their role in regulating safety behavior within each modality via targeted suppression. Further cross-modal analysis defines modality-universal safety neurons (US-Neurons) as the shared subset of BS-Neurons identified across individual modalities, serving as the core for defending against harmful cross-modal attacks. We observe that suppressing these neurons substantially degrades safety performance across modalities, while leaving overall utility largely unaffected. Building on these insights, we propose two safety alignment strategies: activation-level safety amplifier and safety neuron calibrator. The proposed strategies enhance model safety through two distinct routes: the former amplifies the activation magnitudes of US-Neurons, while the latter selectively calibrates them via targeted fine-tuning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms prevailing state-of-the-art approaches on safety benchmarks spanning diverse modality combinations, while effectively preserving utility.