Wei Liu

Shaoxiong Yang, Mengyuan Zhang, Shaojun Lin et al.

Deep search has become a fundamental capability of large language models (LLMs) for solving open-domain complex tasks. However, existing approaches typically rely on linear sequential reasoning for both trajectory generation and inference, making it difficult to consistently preserve intermediate states and constraints throughout long-horizon multi-hop search. Consequently, they often suffer from context forgetting, search drift, and inefficient exploration. To address these limitations, we propose $\textbf{G-ReAct}$, a reasoning framework for deep search that organizes reasoning as $\textbf{state evolution over a fixed-topology query graph}$. The evolving graph state explicitly tracks search progress and guides subsequent decisions, transforming exploratory search driven by textual history into graph-guided reasoning under explicit constraints. G-ReAct supports both training and inference: it generates high-quality deep-search trajectories for supervised fine-tuning and provides structured guidance for inference-time search without additional fine-tuning. Experiments demonstrate that with only 1.9K generated trajectories for fine-tuning, Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 achieves $52.6\%$ accuracy on BrowseComp-ZH and $79.0\%$ on XBench, outperforming comparable open-source methods trained on substantially larger datasets, including RL-enhanced methods. Furthermore, when applied at inference time, G-ReAct consistently improves the performance of existing strong LLMs on deep-search tasks. We will publicly release all code and model weights.

Zihan Nan, Yang Gu, Wei Liu et al.

Tabular data processing is central to data work, and LLM-based assistants have recently shown promising capabilities in supporting such tasks. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on table reasoning under single-turn, fully specified instructions, underrepresenting complex table processing that unfolds through multi-turn interactions with evolving user requirements. To bridge this gap, we introduce CITBench, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLMs on interactive tabular data processing. CITBench features a comprehensive taxonomy across four high-level categories--table matching, cleaning, augmentation, and transformation--spanning 18 task types and 1,296 instances curated from datasets across diverse domains. The benchmark supports both offline and online evaluation, where the online setting models multi-turn interactions under constrained operation procedures and structured task scripts, capturing key potential behavioral characteristics of user-in-the-loop tabular data processing. We evaluate a broad suite of open-source and closed-source LLMs on CITBench, revealing a consistent trend: while current models perform well on simple tables and rules, their performance degrades significantly with increasing table complexity, tighter rule dependencies, and noisy multi-turn interaction simulations. These results highlight persistent challenges in understanding, planning, and table-structure awareness for LLMs in extended interactive data processing scenarios.