Yibin Huang

Yibin Huang, Jixiang Hong, Zongzhao Li et al.

Latents from vision foundation models (VFMs) are semantically rich and well suited for visual understanding. Recent representation autoencoder methods such as RAE have shown that they can provide promising latent spaces for image generation. However, VFM latents remain difficult to model directly: DiT-generated latents exhibit spectral mismatch with encoder latents, especially in high-frequency components. Our channel-wise spectral analysis further reveals that these high-frequency components are diffusely distributed across latent channels and entangled with semantic information, making the latent space difficult for DiT to model. To address these challenges, we propose SPAE, latent adaptation framework for generation. Specifically, SPAE employs a compact bottleneck to distill stable semantic information while suppressing high-frequency components, thereby improving the alignment between DiT-generated latents and encoder latents. In addition, we apply a channel-wise masking strategy to promote the decoupling of semantic information and high-frequency details across bottleneck channels. Experiments show that SPAE achieves a favorable balance among visual understanding, generation quality, and reconstruction fidelity.

Yibin Huang, Bin Xu, Hailong Cao et al.

Multi-step search is a fundamental capability for search agents, enabling them to iteratively acquire, refine, and integrate external evidence for complex reasoning QA. However, vanilla GRPO allocates rewards exclusively based on the model's final outputs, yielding outcome-only supervision with no supervisory signals for intermediate reasoning steps. Such sparse supervision easily causes training instability and redundant search behaviors on multi-step search tasks. To mitigate this limitation, we adopt process reward to deliver stepwise supervision signals. For this process reward, we propose two complementary criteria to judge each search step: whether the step yields new evidence to facilitate problem solving, and whether it forms an efficient, pivotal intermediate decision within the overall reasoning trajectory. Building on this insight, we propose BiCAA: a bidirectional credit assignment framework that delivers dense, distinguishing process rewards for search-augmented agents. BiCAA builds bidirectional process rewards by fusing two complementary signals: forward solvability gain and hindsight success criticality. The former quantifies step-wise improvements in answer plausibility, while the latter evaluates each step's necessity for final success via hindsight outcome-based criticality scoring. We modulate and aggregate the two signals and then fuse them with the outcome reward. Experiments on search-augmented QA benchmarks show that BiCAA stabilizes policy optimization, reduces redundant search behavior, and achieves competitive performance.