Fangxin Liu

Minnan Pei, Gang Li, Zeyu Zhu et al.

3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has emerged as a leading technique for real-time novel view synthesis, yet existing 3DGS accelerators suffer from poor architectural scalability: increasing the number of PEs leads to marginal performance improvement during rendering. We identify that the root cause is the tightly coupled ``checking-while-blending'' dataflow, which exacerbates PE underutilization caused by spatial redundancy from irregular Gaussian coverage and temporal redundancy from asynchronous pixel-wise termination under parallel execution. To address this issue, we propose DeGS, a scalable architecture for efficient 3DGS inference. To systematically eliminate the redundancies inherent in rendering, DeGS exploits a decoupled dataflow, restructuring the coupled $α$-checking, transmittance checking, and $α$-blending of the standard rendering process into consecutive workload parsing, reorganization, and blending stages. This allows the fragmented, length-variable, and temporal-dependent workloads to be reorganized into compact, conflict-free, and dense workloads prior to blending, thereby significantly improving PE utilization during parallel blending. Implemented in 28 nm technology, DeGS achieves 2.36$\times$--7.25$\times$ throughput, 1.82$\times$--6.02$\times$ end-to-end speedup, and 1.59$\times$--4.42$\times$ energy efficiency over state-of-the-art 3DGS accelerators (GSCore, GBU, GCC) across diverse scenes and resolutions (720p to 8K). Moreover, scaling from 16 to 1024 PEs, DeGS maintains over 80\% PE utilization at high resolutions, significantly outperforming existing accelerators.

Aofan Liu, Jingxiang Meng, Fangxin Liu et al.

Multi-turn code agents rely on execution feedback to repair incorrect programs, yet standard reinforcement learning paradigms optimize and evaluate policy performance primarily using single-shot outcome rewards. This misalignment conflates initial code generation with feedback-driven refinement, discards granular execution signals across intermediate turns, and fails to evaluate whether the policy actually acquires self-repair capabilities. We propose Test-aware Policy Refinement (TaPR), a framework that transforms execution feedback into a dense per-turn test-pass-ratio reward under a consistent multi-turn interaction protocol. Across six models on 219 code-generation problems from LiveCodeBench, TaPR improves the pooled three-turn success rate (Pass@3) by 2.44 percentage points. In the predefined 7B/8B high-headroom slice, pooled accuracy increases from 30.25% to 33.56% (+3.31 pp), with 42 improvements and 13 regressions in paired trials. On a matched Qwen3-8B ablation, the dense reward supplies nonzero feedback in all of the first ten steps and reaches a higher Hard-subset peak than outcome-only GRPO within the tested budget, although GRPO nearly matches pooled Pass@3 by step 300. Our primary contribution is a reward-decomposition framework and a turn-aware evaluation protocol that decouple first-shot generation quality from multi-turn repair competence.