KV-cache compression

CaM

Superseded baseline#9 of 234 most-superseded

Superseded — cited as a baseline and beaten by newer methods

6 papers critique it · 6 beat it on benchmarks

What papers say

Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites CaM as a baseline.

these single-modal optimizations exhibit limited efficacy in MLLMs due to cross-modal distribution shifts and attention pattern divergence, failing to preserve modality-specific information fidelity.
FlowMM: Cross-Modal Information Flow Guided KV Cache Merging for Efficient Multimodal Context Inference
In contrast, CaM zhang2024cam adaptively merges evicted value states into others but does not merge the corresponding keys.
KeepKV: Eliminating Output Perturbation in KV Cache Compression for Efficient LLMs Inference
most merging methods rely on local heuristics, they often funnel many evicted tokens into a small set of span-boundary tokens. These boundary tokens therefore become the main information carriers, overloading their representations and making them prone to over-merging: excessive aggregation can blur or even erase their original semantics, thereby degrading overall performance.
GRKV: Global Regression for Training-Free KV Cache Compression in Long-Context LLMs
CaM merges the values of evicted tokens only probabilistically, with a non-negligible probability of discarding them and hence losing information.
WeightedKV: Attention Scores Weighted Key-Value Cache Merging for Large Language Models
a fundamental limitation of these approaches is their uniform treatment of keys and values during merging despite their distinct distributional characteristics.
Homogeneous Keys, Heterogeneous Values: Exploiting Local KV Cache Asymmetry for Long-Context LLMs
Notably, both Quest and CaM report results only on LLaMA2, without comparisons to other eviction methods, limiting their relevance to current frontier models.
CAOTE: KV Cache Selection for LLMs via Attention Output Error-Based Token Eviction

Beaten on benchmarks

Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating CaM. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.

What to use instead

Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.