Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (LoRA family)
QLoRA
QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs
Superseded — cited as a baseline and beaten by newer methods
5 papers critique it · 14 beat it on benchmarks
What papers say
Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites QLoRA as a baseline.
Standard PEFT methods like LoRA hu2022lora and QLoRA dettmers2023qlora typically rely on uniform application across layers.
“improves computational efficiency and reduces resource consumption through dynamic quantization and advanced strategies, though it may potentially impact model accuracy.”
“4-bit LLaMA-30B with finetuned LoRA even fails to achieve the accuracy of the original counterpart without finetuning (57.7% vs. 58.2% on MMLU)”
“Through comprehensive experiments on both summarization and classification tasks, we demonstrate that LoRAN with Sinter achieves consistent improvements over strong baselines, including QLoRA (dettmers2023qlora) and its variants.”
“QLoRA does not maintain quantized at inference since the quantized weights need to be converted to again so as to be merged with the LoRA weights.”
Beaten on benchmarks
Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating QLoRA. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.
QDyLoRA beats QLoRA
56.0 vs 19.9
BLEU score · [Falcon-40b, Web-GLM, Rank 2]
QDyLoRA: Quantized Dynamic Low-Rank Adaptation for Efficient Large Language Model TuningIntLoRA-MUL beats QLoRA
0.4242 vs 0.2136
QCorDA beats QLoRA
7.68 vs 4.7
Math · [Quantized, LLaMA-2-7B, rank 128]
Dynamic Context-oriented Decomposition for Task-aware Low-rank Adaptation with Less Forgetting and Faster ConvergenceCTR-LoRA beats QLoRA
24.1 vs 19.3
GSM8K · [LLaMA-3.1-8B, 0.1% budget]
CTR-LoRA: Curvature-Aware and Trust-Region Guided Low-Rank Adaptation for Large Language ModelsQSBoRA-FA beats QLoRA
56.4 vs 49.5
Flanv2 · [LLaMA3-8B NFloat4 rank=64]
SBoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Regional Weight UpdatesQ-GRIT beats QLoRA
0.1455 vs 0.1292
ROUGE-1 · [ALPACA, LLaMA-3.2-3B (r=16)]
GRIT -- Geometry-Aware PEFT with K-FACPreconditioning, Fisher-Guided Reprojection, andDynamic Rank AdaptationIR-QLoRA beats QLoRA
47.4 vs 44.3
MMLU Avg · [LLaMA-7B, 4-bit]
Accurate LoRA-Finetuning Quantization of LLMs via Information RetentionASLoRA beats QLoRA
32.33 vs 30.61
Avg. · [Instruction tuning with LLaMA-2-7B]
ASLoRA: Adaptive Sharing Low-Rank Adaptation Across LayersMSPLoRA beats QLoRA
32.09 vs 30.61
IMLoR2C beats QLoRA
32.08 vs 30.61
Avg. · [Instruction tuning on LLAMA2-7B, 12.6M parameters (IMLoR2C variant)]
LoR2C : Low-Rank Residual Connection Adaptation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-TuningQFuRA beats QLoRA
87.30 vs 83.89
LoR2C beats QLoRA
31.7 vs 30.61
Avg. · [Instruction tuning on LLAMA2-7B, 16.8M parameters]
LoR2C : Low-Rank Residual Connection Adaptation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning
What to use instead
Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.
- May 29, 2026
- May 28, 2026
- May 19, 2026
- May 15, 2026
- May 12, 2026
- May 11, 2026
- May 11, 2026
- May 8, 2026
- May 5, 2026
- May 5, 2026
- May 5, 2026
- RDP LoRARDP LoRA: Geometry-Driven Identification for Parameter-Efficient Adaptation in Large Language ModelsApr 21, 2026