LLM quantization
ARB-LLM
Superseded baseline#34 of 80 most-superseded
Superseded — cited as a baseline and beaten by newer methods
1 papers critique it · 1 beat it on benchmarks
What papers say
Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites ARB-LLM as a baseline.
Existing binarization methods predominantly focus on weight-only designs while overlooking the quantization characteristics of activations, leading to suboptimal performance when activations are quantized to low bit-widths.
Beaten on benchmarks
Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating ARB-LLM. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.
BWLA beats ARB-LLM
60.07 vs 29.00
Avg. · [Qwen3-14B, 6-bit activation]
BWLA: Breaking the Barrier of W1AX Post-Training Quantization for LLMs
What to use instead
Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.
- STaR-QuantSTaR-Quant: State-Time Consistent Post-Training Quantization for Diffusion Large Language ModelsJun 3, 2026
- May 26, 2026
- May 1, 2026
- Bit-by-BitBit-by-Bit: Progressive QAT Strategy with Outlier Channel Splitting for Stable Low-Bit LLMsApr 9, 2026
- Benford-QuantBenford's Law as a Distributional Prior for Post-Training Quantization of Large Language ModelsJan 29, 2026
- HestiaHESTIA: A Hessian-Guided Differentiable Quantization-Aware Training Framework for Extremely Low-Bit LLMsJan 28, 2026
- Layer-Wise High-Impact Parameter Ratio OptimizationLayer-Wise High-Impact Parameter Ratio Optimization in Post-Training Quantization for Large Language ModelsNov 21, 2025
- Sep 28, 2025