LLM quantization
AWQ
AWQ: Activation-aware Weight Quantization for LLM Compression and Acceleration
Heavily superseded — a standard baseline that newer methods routinely beat
9 papers critique it · 15 beat it on benchmarks
What papers say
Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites AWQ as a baseline.
However, if the scaling factor is too large, it will increase the quantization loss of non-outlier weights, while if the scaling factor is too small, it cannot protect these outlier weights well.
“Most works only focus on optimizing distribution transformation or weight clipping ranges ~awq, outlier-plus, shao2023omniquant. While being straightforward, they prove inadequate for extremely low-bit scenarios due to the constrained optimization space.”
“while AWQ falls apart at even 2.15 bits omniquant and OmniQuant produces unusable models at 2 bits, produces high quality models that are close to OmniQuant 3 bit models.”
“as these techniques do not involve gradient-based optimization, unless task-specific calibration data is utilized, they can suffer substantial accuracy degradation on more challenging benchmarks, particularly text generation”
“existing PTQ approaches for LLMs minimize the layer-wise reconstruction loss while treating all tokens uniformly lin2023awq,frantar2022gptq,li2025gptqv2, without accounting for token-level informativeness or importance. Such a token-agnostic design inevitably biases the quantized model toward dominant but redundant visual features”
“We further observe that generic PTQ methods such as GPTQ and AWQ suffer significant performance degradation under W4A16, highlighting the challenge of directly applying standard quantization techniques to VGGT.”
“we observe that GPTQ consistently outperforms AWQ across most tasks”
“For example, awq determine the scaling coefficients based on the magnitude of the activations.”
“SmoothQuant and AWQ algorithms also require calibration data to perform quantization.”
Beaten on benchmarks
Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating AWQ. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.
Reasoning-QAT beats AWQ
41.89 vs 5.12
Avg. · [Qwen3-4B W2G128]
What Makes Low-Bit Quantization-Aware Training Work for Reasoning LLMs? A Systematic StudyLieQ beats AWQ
75.55 vs 25.76
SEPTQ beats AWQ
68.62 vs 251.84
SignRoundV2 beats AWQ
57.88 vs 34.74
Avg · [Llama2-7B, 2 bits, Group Size 128]
SignRoundV2: Closing the Performance Gap in Extremely Low-Bit Post-Training Quantization for LLMsButterflyQuant beats AWQ
15.40 vs 37.32
WikiText-2 Perplexity · [LLaMA2-7B]
ButterflyQuant: Ultra-low-bit LLM Quantization through Learnable Orthogonal Butterfly TransformsInvarExplore+AWQ beats AWQ
27.00 vs 37.36
Perplexity · [13B model, C4]
Exploring Model Invariance with Discrete Search for Ultra-Low-Bit QuantizationSTaR-Quant beats AWQ
57.07 vs 48.09
Avg. · [W4A4 (4-bit weight and activation) on LLADA-8B]
STaR-Quant: State-Time Consistent Post-Training Quantization for Diffusion Large Language ModelsQMC (no noise) beats AWQ
10.43 vs 12.67
ApiQ beats AWQ
5.77 vs 6.24
WikiText2 PPL · [LLaMA-2-7B, 3-bit]
Enhancing Ultra-Low-Bit Quantization of Large Language Models Through Saliency-Aware Partial RetrainingADMM-Q beats AWQ
8.55 vs 9.20
Wiki-2 PPL · [Qwen3 4B-Base W4]
ADMM-Q: An Improved Hessian-based Weight Quantizer for Post-Training Quantization of Large Language ModelsOSAQ_+AWQ beats AWQ
6.82 vs 7.10
WikiText2 3-8B · [W4A16]
OSAQ: Outlier Self-Absorption for Accurate Low-bit LLM QuantizationGPTQ beats AWQ
70.6 vs 68.2
Avg · [Dream-7B W4A16 g128]
Quantization Meets dLLMs: A Systematic Study of Post-training Quantization for Diffusion LLMs
What to use instead
Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.
- May 29, 2026
- LFQLFQ: Logit-aware Final-block Quantization for Boosting the Generation Quality of Low-Bit Quantized LLMsMay 28, 2026
- ADMM-QADMM-Q: An Improved Hessian-based Weight Quantizer for Post-Training Quantization of Large Language ModelsMay 11, 2026
- May 6, 2026
- Apr 11, 2026
- Jan 21, 2026
- Grouped Lattice Vector Quantization (GLVQ)Learning Grouped Lattice Vector Quantizers for Low-Bit LLM CompressionOct 23, 2025
- Sep 28, 2025
- Bi-VLMBi-VLM: Pushing Ultra-Low Precision Post-Training Quantization Boundaries in Vision-Language ModelsSep 23, 2025
- Sep 18, 2025