LLM reasoning / chain-of-thought

Chain-of-Thought

Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models

Heavily superseded#1 of 772 most-superseded · first seen Jan 28, 2022

Heavily superseded — a standard baseline that newer methods routinely beat

25 papers critique it · 13 beat it on benchmarks

What papers say

Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites Chain-of-Thought as a baseline.

errors can propagate through the reasoning chain, and there is no principled mechanism to revisit decisions or explore alternative strategies.
STATe-of-Thoughts: Structured Action Templates for Tree-of-Thoughts
However, despite these advances, LLMs frequently exhibit limitations in their logical consistency, accuracy, and self-correction abilities when confronted with highly intricate or chaotic reasoning problems
Enhancing Self-Correction in Large Language Models through Multi-Perspective Reflection
However, CoT is fundamentally linear: once a reasoning step is generated, the model commits to it, often propagating early errors into final failures.
Tree of Thoughts as a Classical Heuristic Search Problem: Formal Foundations and Design Patterns
Studies have shown that simple approaches like CoT are inadequate for tasks that demand decomposition into sub-tasks
GOT4Rec: Graph of Thoughts for Sequential Recommendation
sprague2025to reported that on the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark hendrycks2021measuring, 95\% of the performance gain from CoT is attributed to questions involving symbolic reasoning.
Does Self-Consistency Improve the Recall of Encyclopedic Knowledge?
Nevertheless, CoT alone does not guarantee the factual correctness of the underlying statements within the reasoning chain.
Enhancing Factual Accuracy and Citation Generation in LLMs via Multi-Stage Self-Verification
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting~wei2022chain, zhang2023multimodal, lyu2023faithful, while enhancing reasoning, may not ensure its steps visually align with the image and can be sensitive to setup or resource-intensive.
MRFD: Multi-Region Fusion Decoding with Self-Consistency for Mitigating Hallucinations in LVLMs
Although CoT has led to remarkable achievements, it does not always provide positive outcomes and sometimes hinders reasoning performance
Unveiling and Causalizing CoT: A Causal Pespective
it still relies on a relatively simple, linear flow of thought, which can become limiting for tasks involving more complex reasoning
AURORA:Automated Training Framework of Universal Process Reward Models via Ensemble Prompting and Reverse Verification
In this paper, we reveal a strikingly counterintuitive finding: Chain-of-Thought prompting unexpectedly degrades LLM performances in certain problem-solving contexts.
The Curse of CoT: On the Limitations of Chain-of-Thought in In-Context Learning
this capability typically relies on explicit supervision (annotated CoT data), is confined to a discrete token space, and is ultimately capped by the base model's pre-trained capabilities
Pretraining with Token-Level Adaptive Latent Chain-of-Thought
CoT's linear structure fails to capture the branching nature of mathematical reasoning, where multiple strategies are considered, partial arguments explored, and errors necessitate backtracking
Limits of PRM-Guided Tree Search for Mathematical Reasoning with LLMs

Beaten on benchmarks

Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating Chain-of-Thought. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.

What to use instead

Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.