LLM reasoning / chain-of-thought

PRIME

Superseded baseline#19 of 772 most-superseded

Superseded — cited as a baseline and beaten by newer methods

2 papers critique it · 1 beat it on benchmarks

What papers say

Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites PRIME as a baseline.

this specific format only holds under certain assumptions
rePIRL: Learn PRM with Inverse RL for LLM Reasoning
PRIME differs crucially by: [(a)] Employing per-token rewards derived from log-likelihood ratios, which reward-guided generation literatures (discrete GANs, human preference modeling, generation quality evaluation etc) suggests is much less effective than our holistic step-wise discriminators.
Your Reward Function for RL is Your Best PRM for Search: Unifying RL and Search-Based TTS

Beaten on benchmarks

Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating PRIME. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.

What to use instead

Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.