Speculative decoding
DART
DART: Open-Domain Structured Data Record to Text Generation
Superseded baseline#28 of 151 most-superseded · first seen Jul 6, 2020
Superseded — cited as a baseline and beaten by newer methods
1 papers critique it · 2 beat it on benchmarks
What papers say
Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites DART as a baseline.
Still, it relies on continuity-aware tree pruning with an external $N$-gram continuity score and a large $N$-gram trie at runtime~liu2026dart. By contrast, our proposed DDTree keeps the same one-pass DFlash drafter and constructs the tree directly from the per-position probabilities produced by that pass. This avoids auxiliary external scoring and gives an explicit surrogate objective that our best-first construction provably maximizes.
Beaten on benchmarks
Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating DART. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.
FlexDraft beats DART
5.88 vs 2.28
GSM8K Speedup · [Qwen3-8B]
FlexDraft: Flexible Speculative Decoding via Attention Tuning and Bonus-Guided CalibrationDomino beats DART
5.47 vs 2.25
Overall Avg. Speedup · [Qwen3-4B, Temperature = 0]
Domino: Decoupling Causal Modeling from Autoregressive Drafting in Speculative Decoding
What to use instead
Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.
- Jun 3, 2026
- Jun 2, 2026
- Hybrid Verified DecodingHybrid Verified Decoding: Learning to Allocate Verification in Speculative DecodingMay 31, 2026
- May 28, 2026
- May 28, 2026
- May 28, 2026
- May 19, 2026
- May 19, 2026
- May 9, 2026
- May 8, 2026
- May 1, 2026
- Apr 21, 2026