Speculative decoding
ParallelSpec
Superseded baseline#42 of 151 most-superseded
Cited as a baseline — critiqued by newer work, not yet beaten on a benchmark here
3 papers critique it · 0 beat it on benchmarks
What papers say
Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites ParallelSpec as a baseline.
Once alternatives from different depths are combined into a draft tree, they form a large combinatorial space in which many paths are not coherent continuations, and the verifier wastes budget on them.
“these approaches still use target model information, making them inherently target-dependent”
“ParallelSpec~xiao2024parallelspec proposed parallel drafting with a single transformer layer, but omits critical implementation details---notably whether and how target model hidden states are utilized---and does not address the memory scaling challenges that arise from extended training sequences with multiple parallel prediction positions.”
What to use instead
Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.
- Jun 3, 2026
- Jun 2, 2026
- Hybrid Verified DecodingHybrid Verified Decoding: Learning to Allocate Verification in Speculative DecodingMay 31, 2026
- May 28, 2026
- May 28, 2026
- May 28, 2026
- May 19, 2026
- May 19, 2026
- May 9, 2026
- May 8, 2026
- May 1, 2026
- Apr 21, 2026