Speculative decoding
SSD
Superseded baseline#36 of 151 most-superseded
Superseded — cited as a baseline and beaten by newer methods
2 papers critique it · 1 beat it on benchmarks
What papers say
Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites SSD as a baseline.
Some approaches integrate DLLMs with speculative decoding~campbell2025self,cheng2025deerdraftdiffusionverify; however, such designs introduce autoregressive decoding behavior into DLLM inference, thereby undermining the distinctive non-autoregressive reasoning characteristics of DLLMs.
“SSD instead increases acceptance by adding a constant probability bias, enabling long-tail sampling but ignoring acoustic similarity and risking erroneous acceptances.”
Beaten on benchmarks
Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating SSD. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.
FeF-DLLM (step=4) beats SSD
49.39 vs 43.09
FeF-DLLM (step=2) beats SSD
48.78 vs 43.09
What to use instead
Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.
- May 14, 2026
- Apr 6, 2026
- Principled Coarse-Graining (PCG)Principled Coarse-Grained Acceptance for Speculative Decoding in SpeechNov 5, 2025