Tool use / function calling
ToolACE
ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Calling
Heavily superseded — a standard baseline that newer methods routinely beat
2 papers critique it · 4 beat it on benchmarks
What papers say
Verbatim critique sentences, each from a paper that cites ToolACE as a baseline.
Prior works often rely on annotated or synthetic APIs, which lack reliability and struggle to scale across larger tool sets. These approaches also face limitations in diversity, quality, and coverage.
“While APIGen~liu2024apigen, ToolACE~liu2024toolace, and DeCRIM~ferraz2024llm produce verified function-call traces from fully specified queries, and works such as Clarify-When-Necessary~zhang2023clarify theorize when to seek clarification without training a model for it, DiaFORGE unifies three mutually reinforcing contributions absent from any single prior work: (i)~disambiguation-centric synthesis that structurally obliges the assistant to navigate near-duplicate API surfaces via injected distractors and a two-phase coercive dialogue protocol; (ii)~reasoning-trace SFT that jointly teaches tool disambiguation and argument solicitation in a single multi-turn curriculum across 3--70~B parameter models; and (iii)~a dynamic agentic evaluation that redeploys fine-tuned models in a live conversational loop with a simulated user, measuring end-to-end goal completion rather than isolated turn accuracy.”
Beaten on benchmarks
Head-to-head results where a newer method reports beating ToolACE. Values are copied from the source paper's tables — verify against the cited paper.
AgentLM-7B beats ToolACE
37.1 vs 10.3
Overall · [Tool-Use-Finetuned Models]
CRITICTOOL: Evaluating Self-Critique Capabilities of Large Language Models in Tool-Calling Error ScenariosASA beats ToolACE
41.94 vs 28.76
Overall First Call Accuracy · [NESTFUL evaluation]
ASA: Activation Steering for Tool-Calling Domain AdaptationToolACE-DEV beats ToolACE
82.44 vs 80.70
Overall · [BFCL benchmark overall]
ToolACE-DEV: Self-Improving Tool Learning via Decomposition and EVolution
What to use instead
Recent methods in the same sub-problem, not yet superseded in the knowledge base — arXiv benchmark leaders, not vetted production recommendations.