NANAAug 27, 2010

Numerical comparisons among some methods for Hamiltonian problems

arXiv:1008.47915 citationsh-index: 36
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

For researchers in numerical integration of Hamiltonian systems, this provides a practical comparison of methods, but it is an incremental contribution.

The paper numerically compares energy-preserving integrators and symplectic methods for Hamiltonian problems, using constant and variable stepsize. Results show that energy-preserving methods maintain energy conservation more accurately than symplectic methods, especially with variable stepsize.

We report a few sumerical tests comparing some newly defined energy-preserving integrators and symplectic methods, using either constant and variable stepsize.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes