NANAJan 21, 2011

Handling congestion in crowd motion modeling

arXiv:1101.41023.3139 citationsh-index: 31
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work provides a mathematically rigorous treatment of congestion in crowd motion models for researchers in applied mathematics and physics, but it is incremental as it builds on existing non-smooth mechanics and optimal transport frameworks.

The paper develops a non-smooth framework for modeling crowd motion where congestion is handled by enforcing that actual velocities are the closest admissible velocities to desired ones in a least squares sense, preventing overlap. The approach is formulated at both microscopic and macroscopic levels, using Wasserstein distance to reveal the sweeping process nature and prove existence results despite non-smoothness.

We address here the issue of congestion in the modeling of crowd motion, in the non-smooth framework: contacts between people are not anticipated and avoided, they actually occur, and they are explicitly taken into account in the model. We limit our approach to very basic principles in terms of behavior, to focus on the particular problems raised by the non-smooth character of the models. We consider that individuals tend to move according to a desired, or spontanous, velocity. We account for congestion by assuming that the evolution realizes at each time an instantaneous balance between individual tendencies and global constraints (overlapping is forbidden): the actual velocity is defined as the closest to the desired velocity among all admissible ones, in a least square sense. We develop those principles in the microscopic and macroscopic settings, and we present how the framework of Wasserstein distance between measures allows to recover the sweeping process nature of the problem on the macroscopic level, which makes it possible to obtain existence results in spite of the non-smooth character of the evolution process. Micro and macro approaches are compared, and we investigate the similarities together with deep differences of those two levels of description.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes