NANAApr 23, 2012

Pre-asymptotic Error Analysis of CIP-FEM and FEM for Helmholtz Equation with High Wave Number. Part II: $hp$ version

arXiv:1204.5061115 citationsh-index: 28

Analysis pending

In this paper, which is part II in a series of two, the pre-asymptotic error analysis of the continuous interior penalty finite element method (CIP-FEM) and the FEM for the Helmholtz equation in two and three dimensions is continued. While part I contained results on the linear CIP-FEM and FEM, the present part deals with approximation spaces of order $p \ge 1$. By using a modified duality argument, pre-asymptotic error estimates are derived for both methods under the condition of $\frac{kh}{p}\le C_0\big(\frac{p}{k}\big)^{\frac{1}{p+1}}$, where $k$ is the wave number, $h$ is the mesh size, and $C_0$ is a constant independent of $k, h, p$, and the penalty parameters. It is shown that the pollution errors of both methods in $H^1$-norm are $O(k^{2p+1}h^{2p})$ if $p=O(1)$ and are $O\Big(\frac{k}{p^2}\big(\frac{kh}{σp}\big)^{2p}\Big)$ if the exact solution $u\in H^2(\Om)$ which coincide with existent dispersion analyses for the FEM on Cartesian grids. Here $\si$ is a constant independent of $k, h, p$, and the penalty parameters. Moreover, it is proved that the CIP-FEM is stable for any $k, h, p>0$ and penalty parameters with positive imaginary parts. Besides the advantage of the absolute stability of the CIP-FEM compared to the FEM, the penalty parameters may be tuned to reduce the pollution effects.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes