An Evaluation of Popular Copy-Move Forgery Detection Approaches
This work provides a systematic comparison for researchers in image forensics, but it is incremental as it focuses on evaluating existing methods rather than introducing new ones.
The paper evaluated 15 popular copy-move forgery detection algorithms to determine which perform best in various postprocessing scenarios, finding that keypoint-based features like SIFT and SURF and block-based features such as DCT and DWT exhibit strong robustness against noise and downsampling.
A copy-move forgery is created by copying and pasting content within the same image, and potentially post-processing it. In recent years, the detection of copy-move forgeries has become one of the most actively researched topics in blind image forensics. A considerable number of different algorithms have been proposed focusing on different types of postprocessed copies. In this paper, we aim to answer which copy-move forgery detection algorithms and processing steps (e.g., matching, filtering, outlier detection, affine transformation estimation) perform best in various postprocessing scenarios. The focus of our analysis is to evaluate the performance of previously proposed feature sets. We achieve this by casting existing algorithms in a common pipeline. In this paper, we examined the 15 most prominent feature sets. We analyzed the detection performance on a per-image basis and on a per-pixel basis. We created a challenging real-world copy-move dataset, and a software framework for systematic image manipulation. Experiments show, that the keypoint-based features SIFT and SURF, as well as the block-based DCT, DWT, KPCA, PCA and Zernike features perform very well. These feature sets exhibit the best robustness against various noise sources and downsampling, while reliably identifying the copied regions.