Bayesian Mixture Models for Frequent Itemset Discovery
This work addresses interpretability issues in data mining for binary-transaction datasets, but it is incremental as it builds on existing mixture models with Bayesian enhancements.
The authors tackled the problem of interpretability in frequent itemset mining by developing Bayesian mixture models with Dirichlet and Dirichlet process priors, which achieved better performance than a non-Bayesian baseline and were up to 10 times faster than Eclat in querying, though they underestimated probabilities and had higher sensitivity but lower specificity.
In binary-transaction data-mining, traditional frequent itemset mining often produces results which are not straightforward to interpret. To overcome this problem, probability models are often used to produce more compact and conclusive results, albeit with some loss of accuracy. Bayesian statistics have been widely used in the development of probability models in machine learning in recent years and these methods have many advantages, including their abilities to avoid overfitting. In this paper, we develop two Bayesian mixture models with the Dirichlet distribution prior and the Dirichlet process (DP) prior to improve the previous non-Bayesian mixture model developed for transaction dataset mining. We implement the inference of both mixture models using two methods: a collapsed Gibbs sampling scheme and a variational approximation algorithm. Experiments in several benchmark problems have shown that both mixture models achieve better performance than a non-Bayesian mixture model. The variational algorithm is the faster of the two approaches while the Gibbs sampling method achieves a more accurate results. The Dirichlet process mixture model can automatically grow to a proper complexity for a better approximation. Once the model is built, it can be very fast to query and run analysis on (typically 10 times faster than Eclat, as we will show in the experiment section). However, these approaches also show that mixture models underestimate the probabilities of frequent itemsets. Consequently, these models have a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity.