MED-PHNANAFLU-DYNSep 16, 2014

Verification and comparison of four numerical schemes for a 1D viscoelastic blood flow model

arXiv:1302.550578 citationsh-index: 25
AI Analysis

For researchers simulating blood flow in compliant vessels, this work provides a practical comparison of numerical schemes, but it is incremental as it applies existing methods to a known model.

This paper compares four numerical schemes (MacCormack, Taylor-Galerkin, MUSCL, local discontinuous Galerkin) for solving a 1D viscoelastic blood flow model. The schemes are tested on single vessel, bifurcation, and a 55-artery network, with favorable agreement against analytical or clinical data. No specific numerical results (e.g., error percentages) are provided.

A reliable and fast numerical scheme is crucial for the 1D simulation of blood flow in compliant vessels. In this paper, a 1D blood flow model is incorporated with a Kelvin-Voigt viscoelastic arterial wall. This leads to a nonlinear hyperbolic-parabolic system, which is then solved with four numerical schemes, namely: MacCormack, Taylor-Galerkin, MUSCL (monotonic upwind scheme for conservation law) and local discontinuous Galerkin. The numerical schemes are tested on a single vessel, a simple bifurcation and a network with 55 arteries. The numerical solutions are checked favorably against analytical, semi-analytical solutions or clinical observations. Among the numerical schemes, comparisons are made in four important aspects: accuracy, ability to capture shock-like phenomena, computational speed and implementation complexity. The suitable conditions for the application of each scheme are discussed.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes