AILOMar 27, 2013

A New Approach to Updating Beliefs

arXiv:1304.1119v1318 citations
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This work addresses a foundational issue in uncertainty reasoning for AI and decision-making, offering a novel approach to belief updating.

The paper tackles the problem of defining conditional belief functions for Dempster-Shafer belief functions, analogous to conditional probability, by introducing a new definition that avoids issues with the standard Dempster definition and provides a closed-form expression.

We define a new notion of conditional belief, which plays the same role for Dempster-Shafer belief functions as conditional probability does for probability functions. Our definition is different from the standard definition given by Dempster, and avoids many of the well-known problems of that definition. Just as the conditional probability Pr (lB) is a probability function which is the result of conditioning on B being true, so too our conditional belief function Bel (lB) is a belief function which is the result of conditioning on B being true. We define the conditional belief as the lower envelope (that is, the inf) of a family of conditional probability functions, and provide a closed form expression for it. An alternate way of understanding our definition of conditional belief is provided by considering ideas from an earlier paper [Fagin and Halpern, 1989], where we connect belief functions with inner measures. In particular, we show here how to extend the definition of conditional probability to non measurable sets, in order to get notions of inner and outer conditional probabilities, which can be viewed as best approximations to the true conditional probability, given our lack of information. Our definition of conditional belief turns out to be an exact analogue of our definition of inner conditional probability.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes