AICCApr 24, 2013

Decision-Theoretic Troubleshooting: Hardness of Approximation

arXiv:1304.6551v45 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the computational complexity of decision-theoretic troubleshooting, showing it is intractable for practical applications, which is incremental as it builds on prior NP-completeness results.

The paper tackles the problem of computing approximate repair strategies for malfunctioning devices with minimal expected cost, proving that this task is NP-hard across several variants.

Decision-theoretic troubleshooting is one of the areas to which Bayesian networks can be applied. Given a probabilistic model of a malfunctioning man-made device, the task is to construct a repair strategy with minimal expected cost. The problem has received considerable attention over the past two decades. Efficient solution algorithms have been found for simple cases, whereas other variants have been proven NP-complete. We study several variants of the problem found in literature, and prove that computing approximate troubleshooting strategies is NP-hard. In the proofs, we exploit a close connection to set-covering problems.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes