An Exploratory Ethnographic Study of Issues and Concerns with Whole Genome Sequencing
This addresses privacy and ethical concerns for individuals and healthcare stakeholders as WGS becomes more widespread, but it is incremental as it builds on existing qualitative research in this area.
The study investigated users' perceptions of privacy and ethical issues with Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) through interviews with 16 participants, finding common trust concerns, fear of discrimination, and a demand for strict control over genetic information.
Progress in Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) will soon allow a large number of individuals to have their genome fully sequenced. This lays the foundations to improve modern healthcare, enabling a new era of personalized medicine where diagnosis and treatment is tailored to the patient's genetic makeup. It also allows individuals motivated by personal curiosity to have access to their genetic information, and use it, e.g., to trace their ancestry. However, the very same progress also amplifies a number of ethical and privacy concerns, that stem from the unprecedented sensitivity of genomic information and that are not well studied. This paper presents an exploratory ethnographic study of users' perception of privacy and ethical issues with WGS, as well as their attitude toward different WGS programs. We report on a series of semi-structured interviews, involving 16 participants, and analyze the results both quantitatively and qualitatively. Our analysis shows that users exhibit common trust concerns and fear of discrimination, and demand to retain strict control over their genetic information. Finally, we highlight the need for further research in the area and follow-up studies that build on our initial findings.