AIMay 15, 2014

Properties of Stable Model Semantics Extensions

arXiv:1405.3896v1
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses theoretical limitations in logic programming semantics for researchers in knowledge representation and non-monotonic reasoning, but it is incremental as it builds on known issues with SM semantics.

The paper tackles the lack of existence, relevance, and cumulativity properties in stable model (SM) semantics by defining a class of conservative extensions called affix stable model semantics (ASM) and analyzing two subfamilies (ASMh and ASMm). It provides results that facilitate assessing these properties in ASMh ∪ ASMm, reveals relations among the properties, and clarifies characterizations of SM semantics, such as showing equivalence between lack of existence and lack of cautious monotony.

The stable model (SM) semantics lacks the properties of existence, relevance and cumulativity. If we prospectively consider the class of conservative extensions of SM semantics (i.e., semantics that for each normal logic program P retrieve a superset of the set of stable models of P), one may wander how do the semantics of this class behave in what concerns the aforementioned properties. That is the type of issue dealt with in this paper. We define a large class of conservative extensions of the SM semantics, dubbed affix stable model semantics, ASM, and study the above referred properties into two non-disjoint subfamilies of the class ASM, here dubbed ASMh and ASMm. From this study a number of results stem which facilitate the assessment of semantics in the class ASMh U ASMm with respect to the properties of existence, relevance and cumulativity, whilst unveiling relations among these properties. As a result of the approach taken in our work, light is shed on the characterization of the SM semantics, as we show that the properties of (lack of) existence and (lack of) cautious monotony are equivalent, which opposes statements on this issue that may be found in the literature; we also characterize the relevance failure of SM semantics in a more clear way than usually stated in the literature.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes