MMMay 16, 2014

Block matching algorithm based on Differential Evolution for motion estimation

arXiv:1405.4721v158 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This is an incremental improvement for video coding applications, addressing the trade-off between speed and accuracy in motion estimation.

The paper tackles the computational expense of motion estimation in video coding by proposing a block matching algorithm based on Differential Evolution to reduce the number of search locations, achieving more accurate motion vectors with competitive time rates compared to other fast methods.

Motion estimation is one of the major problems in developing video coding applications. Among all motion estimation approaches, Block matching (BM) algorithms are the most popular methods due to their effectiveness and simplicity for both software and hardware implementations. A BM approach assumes that the movement of pixels within a defined region of the current frame (Macro-Block, MB) can be modeled as a translation of pixels contained in the previous frame. In this procedure, the motion vector is obtained by minimizing the sum of absolute differences (SAD) produced by the MB of the current frame over a determined search window from the previous frame. The SAD evaluation is computationally expensive and represents the most consuming operation in the BM process. The most straightforward BM method is the full search algorithm (FSA) which finds the most accurate motion vector, calculating exhaustively the SAD values for all elements of the search window. Over this decade, several fast BM algorithms have been proposed to reduce the number of SAD operations by calculating only a fixed subset of search locations at the price of a poor accuracy. In this paper, a new algorithm based on Differential Evolution (DE) is proposed to reduce the number of search locations in the BM process. In order to avoid computing several search locations, the algorithm estimates the SAD values (fitness) for some locations using the SAD values of previously calculated neighboring positions. Since the proposed algorithm does not consider any fixed search pattern or other different assumption, a high probability for finding the true minimum (accurate motion vector) is expected. In comparison to other fast BM algorithms, the proposed method deploys more accurate motion vectors yet delivering competitive time rates.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes