AIJul 25, 2014

Extending Acyclicity Notions for Existential Rules (\emph{long version})

arXiv:1407.6885v135 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses termination issues in ontology-based query answering, but appears incremental as it builds on existing acyclicity conditions.

The paper tackles the undecidability of entailment with existential rules by proposing a new tool to extend acyclicity conditions for chase termination, and extends these results to rules with nonmonotonic negation under stable model semantics.

Existential rules have been proposed for representing ontological knowledge, specifically in the context of Ontology-Based Query Answering. Entailment with existential rules is undecidable. We focus in this paper on conditions that ensure the termination of a breadth-first forward chaining algorithm known as the chase. First, we propose a new tool that allows to extend existing acyclicity conditions ensuring chase termination, while keeping good complexity properties. Second, we consider the extension to existential rules with nonmonotonic negation under stable model semantics and further extend acyclicity results obtained in the positive case.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes