SESep 22, 2014

System Model Semantics of Class Diagrams

arXiv:1409.6635v131 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of semantic ambiguity in UML for software engineers and modelers, but it appears incremental as it builds on existing system model concepts.

The authors tackled the challenge of defining precise semantics for UML by proposing a denotational mapping into a system model, and demonstrated this approach with a comprehensive version of class diagrams, specifically UML/P class diagrams, to assess usability.

Defining semantics for UML is a difficult task. Disagreements in the meaning of UML constructs as well as the size of UML are major obstacles. In this report, we describe our approach to define the semantics for UML. Semantics is defined denotationally as a mapping into our semantics domain called the system model [4, 5, 6]. We demonstrate our approach by defining the semantics for a comprehensive version of class diagrams. The semantics definition is detailed for UML/P class diagrams, a variant of class diagrams which restricts the use of a few methodologically and semantically involved concepts. Class diagrams are well-known and rather easy to understand and thus perfect to examine the usability of the system model for precise semantic mappings.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes