DSLGMLOct 14, 2014

Tighter Low-rank Approximation via Sampling the Leveraged Element

arXiv:1410.3886v137 citations
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need for faster and more accurate low-rank approximations in spectral norm, which is crucial for applications in data analysis and machine learning, though it is incremental by building on existing sampling and optimization techniques.

The paper tackles the problem of computing low-rank matrix approximations in spectral norm with improved computational efficiency, achieving a runtime of O(nnz(M) + nκ²r⁵/ε²) compared to existing methods that require O(nnz(M) + nr²/ε⁴) for Frobenius norm approximations.

In this work, we propose a new randomized algorithm for computing a low-rank approximation to a given matrix. Taking an approach different from existing literature, our method first involves a specific biased sampling, with an element being chosen based on the leverage scores of its row and column, and then involves weighted alternating minimization over the factored form of the intended low-rank matrix, to minimize error only on these samples. Our method can leverage input sparsity, yet produce approximations in {\em spectral} (as opposed to the weaker Frobenius) norm; this combines the best aspects of otherwise disparate current results, but with a dependence on the condition number $κ= σ_1/σ_r$. In particular we require $O(nnz(M) + \frac{nκ^2 r^5}{ε^2})$ computations to generate a rank-$r$ approximation to $M$ in spectral norm. In contrast, the best existing method requires $O(nnz(M)+ \frac{nr^2}{ε^4})$ time to compute an approximation in Frobenius norm. Besides the tightness in spectral norm, we have a better dependence on the error $ε$. Our method is naturally and highly parallelizable. Our new approach enables two extensions that are interesting on their own. The first is a new method to directly compute a low-rank approximation (in efficient factored form) to the product of two given matrices; it computes a small random set of entries of the product, and then executes weighted alternating minimization (as before) on these. The sampling strategy is different because now we cannot access leverage scores of the product matrix (but instead have to work with input matrices). The second extension is an improved algorithm with smaller communication complexity for the distributed PCA setting (where each server has small set of rows of the matrix, and want to compute low rank approximation with small amount of communication with other servers).

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes